HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
SHRI JUSTICE ANAND PATHAK
Harishankar Gupta – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
WP 6407/2024
REFUND OF COURT FEES - LOK ADALAT - DUTY OF REVENUE AUTHORITIES
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the respondent to refund the refundable court fee amount as instructed by the High Court and the civil court, Gwalior, without any delay.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that it is the duty of revenue authorities to ensure that the refund of court fees be made to the litigant immediately, not only in the interest of that litigant but also in the interest of the very concept for which Lok Adalat has been conceptualized under the Legal Services Authority Act, 1987.
Issues: Whether the revenue authorities have a duty to ensure that the refund of court fees is made without any delay.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the Legal Services Authority Act, 1987, which conceptualizes Lok Adalat to keep the spirit of settlement alive, and held that it is the duty of revenue authorities to ensure that the refund of court fees is made without any delay.
Final Decision: The petition was disposed of, and the court directed the concerned authorities, including the Collector, District Gwalior, to ensure that the petitioner shall not feel harassed for getting his legitimate dues back by way of court fees after due verification.
ORDER
1 . The present petition has been preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking following reliefs:-
5. It is the submission of learned counsel for petitioner that petitioner is facing non-refund of court fees despite case being settled in National Lok Adalat. He referred order dated 24.11.2023 passed in W.P.No.3128/2022. In compliance of order dated 24.11.203m S.D.O. (Revenue), Lashkar, Gwalior passed order dated 15.02.2023, in which permission has been granted to refund the court fees but in reality, no court fees has been refunded yet to the petitioner. He seeks consideration over his case. 6. Learned counsel for respondent/State fairly submitted that appropriate steps shall be taken and concerned officer shall pass appropriate order in accordance with law and petitioner shall soon get benefit of refund of court fee.
7. Heard counsel for the rival parties and perused the documents appended thereto.
8. Considering the submissions, It is the duty of revenue authorities to ensure that refund of court fees be made to the litigant immediately. It is not only in the interest of that litigant only but in the interest of the very concept for which Lok Adalat has been conceptualized under Legal Services Authority Act,
1987. To keep the spirit of settlement in Lok Adalat alive, it is the duty of revenue authorities to ensure that refund of court fees is made without any delay.
9. In the present case, S.D.O. has passed the order for refund of court fees but still the fruits of that order have not been realized by petitioner. It is expected from the concerned authorities including Collector, District Gwalior to ensure that petitioner shall not feel harassed for getting his legitimate dues back by way of court fees after due verification.
10. Needful be done at an expeditious note. so that petitioner may not have to run pillar to post and post to pillar.
11. Petition stands disposed of accordingly. (ANAND PATHAK) JUDGE Vishal
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.