SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 28525

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Vikram Bhai Shriram Bhai Purohit – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Sharad Gupta,Advocate General

ORDER

The petitioner has preferred this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance an appropriate writ, order or direction thereby directing the respondents No.2 and 3 to take an appropriate action against the respondent No.4, who has illegally snatched a Proclain Machine HX-360 owned by the petitioner. On 31.8.2023 when the said Proclain Machine was crossing the petrol pump of the respondent No.4, then the respondent No.4 stopped the truck loaded with this machine and with the help of some anti-social element took away the said machine to his petrol pump and unloaded the same at the premises of the petrol pump. There is some dispute regarding the outstanding amount of diesel with one Darshan Dwarikadas Rathi, who is a contractor and was using the machine of the petitioner. The petitioner approached the respondent No.3 i.e. Station House Officer for lodging a complaint in respect of the commission of cognizable offence, but the same was not registered.

Thereafter the petitioner approached the respondent No.2/Superintendent of Police, Narsinghpur with a written complaint, wherein in para No. 4, a specific recital was made in respect of the refusal to recei

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top