Applicant has filed this application under section 439(2) of CrPC, for cancellation of bail granted to respondent no.2 Abhishek Kumar Dwivedi.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that said respondent was released on anticipatory bail by this court. After his release on anticipatory bail, said respondent had assaulted one Arun Kumar Mishra who is a witness in case of Manoj Mishra. It is submitted that applicant is tampering with the evidence and is threatening the witnesses of the case, therefore, anticipatory bail application be dismissed. It is also argued by learned counsel for the applicant that application for cancellation of bail is filed on basis of supervening event and not on merits. Applicant has a good case, therefore, bail granted to respondent no.2 be cancelled. 3. Learned counsel for respondent no.2 opposed the application. It is submitted that complaint under minor section is registered against the respondent no.2. Said complaint is false. Arun Kumar Mishra, who has lodged a F.I.R against respondent no.2 has issued a cheque for Rs.8 lakhs on 10.7.2023 which bounced, therefore, he wanted that bail granted to respondent no.2 be cancelled and false report