HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Hunny @ Kakku – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
(Indore Dt.03.3.2020)
Per Shailendra Shukla, J:-
The present reference and appeal arise out of judgment
dated 30.9.2019, pronounced in Special Case No.2147/2018
by the 15th A.S.J. and Special Judge, Indore whereby,
--2-- CRRFC No.12/2019 & CRA. No.8818/2019
appellant – Honey @ Kakku has been convicted for the
offence punishable under Sections 363, 366, 376AB, 302,
201, 376A of IPC and under Section 5(n) read with Section 6
of POCSO Act. The accused has not been sentenced
separately under Section 5(n) read with Section 6 of POCSO
Act, in view of Section 42 of POCSO Act which provides for
sentencing under the provisions of IPC, if such provision
provides for stiffer sentence and therefore was sentenced
under Section 376AB in place of Section 5(n) read with
Section (6) of POCSO Act. Ultimately, the appellant has been
sentenced under various provisions as under :-
Provision of IPC
Sentence
Section 363 IPC
5 years RI with fine of Rs.2000/-. In default
of payment of fine 2 months additional RI.
Section 366 of IPC 7 years RI with fine of Rs.3000/-. In default
of payment of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.