SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 14514

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
SHRI JUSTICE PRANAY VERMA, J
Smt. Ramabai – Appellant
Versus
Suresh – Respondent


Advocates:
Ramesh Kumar Chhazed,

Table of Content
1. contention on injunction (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
2. pending civil suit (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
3. petition found devoid of merits (Para 10)

ORDER

By this petition preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 17.01.2023 [Annexure P/6] passed by the Additional Commissioner, Ujjain Division, Ujjain whereby the orders dated 25.02.2020 passed by the Sub Divisional Officer, (Revenue) Sub Division Badnagar, District Ujjain and the order dated 28.05.2019 passed by the Tehsildar, Tehsil Badnagar, District Ujjain have been set aside and the mutation application filed by her has been dismissed.

2. The facts are not in dispute between the parties. The disputed land belonged originally to Mangilal who had one son Raghunath and three daughters respondents No.2 to 4. Raghunath has expired and respondent No.5 is his widow and respondent No.6 is his daughter. As per the petitioner, after death of Mangilal partition had taken place between Raghunath and his sisters and they were all allotted separate shares in the disputed land. Vide registered sale deed dated 03.08.2018 the petitioner purchased the disputed land from respondents No.5 & 6.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top