SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(MP) 12400

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Abhishek Raj Ahirwar @ Bhata – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Narendra Nikhare,Advocate General

1.

This criminal appeal has been filed under Section 374 (2) of Cr.P.C by

the appellants being crestfallen by the judgment dated 02.11.2023 passed by

the Additional Sessions Judge, Special Court, No. 8 (Electricity Act),

Jabalpur in Sessions Trial No.43/2001, whereby the appellant (Abhishek Raj

Ahirwar) has been convicted for offences under Section 307/34 of IPC and

Section 25 (1) (B) (B) (two counts) of Arms Act, sentencing him to undergo

R.I. for five years with fine of Rs. 2,000/- (two times) and Rs. 4,000/- and

Rs. 1,000/- respectively with default stipulations and appellant No.2 (Ankit

Raikwar) has been convicted for offences under Section 307/34 of IPC

and Section 25 (1) (B) (B) of Arms Act, sentencing him to undergo R.I. for

one year with fine of Rs. 2,000/- (two times) and Rs. 4,000/- and Rs. 1,000/-

respectively with default stipulation and observation that both the sentences

would run concurrently.

2. Brief facts of the prosecution story, in short, is that on date 07.09.2020

Anshul Kushwaha along with his friend Ansul Sahu at 04:00 pm were

going to Yadav Colony by motorcycle to get the photocopies. Ansul

Kushwaha was driving the motorcycle. When they

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top