SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 28009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT JABALPUR

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK JAIN

ON THE 16th OF APRIL, 2024

WRIT PETITION No. 9720 of 2024

BETWEEN:-

1.

GLEN ALLAN ANTHONY D SOUZA S/O SHRI

ANTHONY D SOUZA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/O

HOUSE

NO.

209, ANMOL AWAS

MARRIAM

CHOWK, SOUTH CIVIL LINE JABALPUR (MADHYA

PRADESH)

2.

MRS MARIA D SOUZA W/O LATE ANTHONY D

SOUZA, AGED ABOUT 86 YEARS, R/O HOUSE NO

209 ANMOL AWAS MARRIAM CHOWK SOUTH

CIVIL LINES JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)

.....PETITIONER

(BY SHRI VRUSHAL BHIDE - ADVOCATE)

AND

1.

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH ITS

PRINCIPAL SECRETARY MINISTRY OF URBAN

ADMINISTRATION AND

DEVELOPMENT

3RD

FLOOR

SHIVAJI

NAGAR,PALIKA

BHAWAN

BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)

2.

THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THROUGH ITS

COM M ISSION ER , OFICE

OF

MUNICIPAL

CORPORATION JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)

3.

THE MUNICPAL CORPORATION THROUGH ITS

EXECUTIVE ENGINEER COLONY CELL OFFICE OF

MUNICIPAL

CORPORATION

JABALPUR

JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)

4.

THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THROUGH ITS

EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BUILDING CELL OFFICE

OF

MUNICIPAL

CORPORATION

JABALPUR

(MADHYA PRADESH)

5.

SMT NITA PANDEY W/O SHRI UMA SHANKAR

PA N D EY R/O

NEAR

ANMOL

APARTMENTS

1

Signed by: PRARTHANA

SURYAVANSHI

Signing time: 4/18/2024

6:33:40 PM

Signature Not Verified

MARRIAM

CHOWK

SOUTH

CIVIL

LINES

JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)

.....RESPONDENTS

(BY SHRI AJAY SHUKLA - ADVOCATE)

This petition coming on for admission this day, the court passed the

following:

Advocates:
Vrushal Bhide,Advocate General

ORDER

The present petition has been filed in the allegation that the respondent No.5 is erecting some construction on her land for which either no permission has been obtained from Municipal Corporation in terms of Section 294 of Municipal Corporation Act or the said construction has been carried out contrary to such permission.

2. It is a grievance of the petitioner that by such construction being carried out by respondent No.5 in her land, the ventilation etc of the petitioner is being closed.

3. The grievance raised in the present petition is in the realm of facts Section 307(5) of M.P Municipal Corporation Act gives a right to any person to apply before District Court for injunction, removal or alteration of any building on the ground that it contravened any provisions of Municipal Corporation Act and the by-laws framed thereunder.

4. As there is an equally efficacious and alternative remedy available to the petitioner under Section 307(5) of M.P Municipal Corporation Act, interference is declined.

5. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to avail alternative remedy under Section 307(5) of M.P Municipal Corporation Act.

(VIVEK JAIN) JUDGE Prar Signature Not Verified Signed by: PRARTHANA SURYAVANSHI Signing time: 4/18/2024 6:33:40 PM

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top