2023 Supreme(Online)(MP) 12006
GWALIOR BENCH
BHAMANIYA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent
WP 9763 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT GWALIOR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND RAMESH PHADKE
ON THE 1st OF MAY, 2023
WRIT PETITION No. 9763 of 2023
BETWEEN:-
BHAMANIYA S/O SHRI KASIYA, AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS,
OCCUPATION:
LABOUR
R/O
VILLAGE
BANSAPUR
TEHSIL ASHOKNAGAR (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....PETITIONER
(BY SHRI S.K. SHARMA - ADVOCATE)
AND
1.
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH
PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY,
REVENUE
DEPARTMENT,
VALLABH
BHAWAN,
BHOPAL
(MADHYA PRADESH)
2.
THE
COLLECTOR ASHOKNAGAR
(MADHYA
PRADESH)
3.
TEHSILDAR ASHOKNAGAR (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(SHRI VIVEK KHEDKAR - ADDITIONAL ADVOCATE GENERAL)
This petition coming on for admission this day, the court passed the
following:
ORDER
The present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has
been filed against the order dated 20.01.2023 (Annexure P/1) passed by
Additional Collector, District Ashoknagar in Case No.0030/Revision/2022-23
by which the revision filed by the petitioner against the order dated 08.07.2022
passed by the Tehsildar under Madhya Pradesh Krishi Prayojan Ke Liye Upyog
1
Signed by: PAWAN KUMAR
Signing time: 03-05-2023
12:54:34 PM
Signature Not Verified
Ki Ja Rahi Dakhal Rahit Bhoomi Per Bhoomi Swami Adhikaro Ka Praday Kiya
Jana (Vishesh Upband) Adhiniyam, 1984, has been dismissed.
It has been submitted by counsel for the petitioner that the Tehsildar
without adverting to the grounds mentioned in the application vide Annexure
P/3 has passed the order dated 08.07.2022 and thereafter, the petitioner
challenged the aforesaid order before the Additional Collector by way of filing a
revision which was registered as Case No.0030/Revision/2022-23 and the
learned Additional Collector has affirmed the order passed by Tehsildar. It was
further submitted that the petitioner is landless person and is in possession of
the Government land bearing Survey Nos.340, 347, 349, 350 ad-measuring
1.473 hectares for more than 50 years. It was further submitted that as per the
provisions of M.P. Krishi Prayojan Ke Liye Upyog Ki Ja Rahi Dakhal Rahit
Bhumi Par Bhumi Swami Adhikaron Ka Pradan Kiya Jana Adhiniyam,
1984 (for short "the Adhiniyam,1984"), the petitioner is entitled for grant of
patta o n the Government land. As the impugned orders have been passed
without considering the provisions of Adhiniyam, 1984, therefore, the same are
per se illegal and deserve to be set aside.
Per contra, learned State Counsel appearing has opposed the prayer so
made by counsel for the petitioner and prayed for dismissal of the petition as
there is no any specific provision with regard to grant of Patta over the
Government land.
Heard counsel for the parties and perused the record.
Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, the
impugned orders clearly appear to be non-speaking orders, therefore, the same
are quashed. The matter is relegated back to the Tehsildar to decide the
application afresh in the light of the provisions of Section 3 of the Adhiniyam,
2
Signed by: PAWAN KUMAR
Signing time: 03-05-2023
12:54:34 PM
Signature Not Verified
(MILIND RAMESH PHADKE)
JUDGE
1984 and pass a self-contained speaking order on the application after giving
proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.
Let this exercise be done within a period of three months from the date
of receipt of certified copy of this order.
With the aforesaid observation, the petitions is disposed off finally.
pwn*
3
Signed by: PAWAN KUMAR
Signing time: 03-05-2023
12:54:34 PM
Signature Not Verified