ORDER

Regard being had to the similitude of facts and issue involved in both the petitions, they are being disposed off by the common order.

2. The facts of the case are noted from WP No.12286/2024.

3. The present petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 04.03.2024 (Annexure P/1) passed in Case No. 167/7/teen/2021 by Labour Commissioner, M.P. whereby a reference has been made that whether the transfer made by Century Yarn and Century Danim, Village & Post-Satrati, Dist. Khargone of Century Yarn and Century Denum Unit in favour of Manjit Global Pvt. Ltd. and Manjit Cotton Pvt. Ltd. and as a consequence payment of compensation under Section 25-FF of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (in short I.D. Act) by the concerned unit to the members of respondent No.3/Union is legal and valid ? if not then labours are entitled for which relief ? and in this regard what directions can be issued to the employer ?

4. Counsel for the petitioner argued that he is not aggrieved with the order of reference so far it relates to between the respondent No.2 and respondent No.3, however, making him also part of the reference is not permissible. It is urged that