SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 6317

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Devchand – Appellant
Versus
Chandarlal – Respondent


Advocates:
Gagan Parashar,

ORDER

1. Heard on IA No.7171/2023, which is an application for taking documents on record.

2. Documents may be relevant for proper adjudication of this petition, therefore, IA is allowed and the documents are taken on record.

3. Both the parties heard.

4. Petitioners have preferred this miscellaneous petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India being aggrieved by the impugned order dated 1.8.2023 passed by the Collector, Rajgarh (Biaora) in Case No.02/Revision/22- 23 and order dated 8.12.2022 passed by the SDO, Biaora in case No.100/A- 13/2021-22.

5. Facts of the case, in brief, are that the respondent has filed an application under Section 131, 132 & 133 of the M.P. Land Revenue Code, 1959 (in short "MPLRC") before the Tehsildar by stating that the passage to his agricultural field was from the Survey No.43/1/1 and 43/2 of village Lodipura and was also from Survey No.27 & 28 of village Habipura, but the petitioners had blocked the passage, therefore, a prayer was made to open the passage.

Tehsildar vide order dated 8.8.2012 has rejected the application. Thereafter SDO, Biaora vide order dated 8.12.2022 allowed the appeal. Being aggrieved by the said order, petitio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top