SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(MP) 8893

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Vivek Pouranik – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Binod Kumar Tiwari,Advocate General

This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has

been filed seeking following reliefs :-

3 MP No.2358/2021

“That, it is therefore prayed that Hon’ble Court be

pleased to set aside the order under challenge dated

02.07.2021 (Annexure-P/11) passed by learned

Commissioner, Sagar Division, Sagar and impugned

order dated 28.12.2017 (Annexure-P/7) passed by

Additional Collector, Chhattarpur, in the interest of

justice.

Any other relief or direction which this Hon’ble

Court deems fit may also be granted to the

petitioner.”

A preliminary objection is raised by learned counsel for

respondent that the petition suffers from suppression of material facts.

The petitioners have already filed a civil suit before the Court of Ist Civil

Judge, Class-I, Chhatarpur in the year 2020 itself and had also prayed

for declaration of order dated 28.12.2017 passed by the Additional

Collector, Chhatarpur in Appeal No.23/Appeal/Nazul/B-121/2016-17 as

null and void. However, the said fact has been suppressed by petitioners.

Thus, it is submitted that petition be dismissed with hea

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top