2023 Supreme(Online)(MP) 8814
1
Cr. A. Nos. 257 of 2016, 296 of 2016,
309 of 2016, 356 of 2016,
408 of 2016 & 709 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT JABALPUR
BEFORE
JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL
&
JUSTICE AMAR NATH (KESHARWANI)
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 257 OF 2016
BETWEEN :-
SACHIN S/O RAMESH BINEKIYA,
AGED 29 YEARS R/O RAMNAGAR
NEW YARD, ITARSI TEHSIL ITARSI
DISTRICT HOSHANGABAD (M.P.)
.…APPELLANT
(BY SHRI SIDDHARTH DATT - ADVOCATE )
AND
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
THROUGH P.S. ITARSI DISTRICT
HOSHANGABAD (M.P.)
.….RESPONDENT
(BY SHRI ARVIND SINGH - GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE)
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 296 OF 2016
BETWEEN :-
1. PAWAN S/O GAJENDRA MOURYA, ,
AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS R/O GANDHI
NAGAR, ITARSI TEHSIL ITARSI
DISTRICT HOSHANGABAD (M.P.)
2. MUKKU @ MUKUL S/O MAHESH
MOURYA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS
R/O G.R.P. COLONY ITARSI TEHSIL
ITARSI DISTRICT, HOSHANGABAD
(M.P.)
Signed by: NAVEEN KUMAR
SARATHE
Signing time: 2/3/2023
5:25:13 PM
Signature Not Verified
2
Cr. A. Nos. 257 of 2016, 296 of 2016,
309 of 2016, 356 of 2016,
408 of 2016 & 709 of 2016
3. ANKUR S/O ARVIND MEHTA, AGED
ABOUT 27 YEARS R/O NEAR
GURUNANAK DALL MILL ITARSI
TEHSIL
ITARSI
DISTRICT
HOSHANGABAD (M.P.)
.…APPELLANT
(BY SHRI AJAY JAIN - ADVOCATE )
AND
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
THROUGH P.S. ITARSI DISTRICT
HOSHANGABAD (M.P.)
.….RESPONDENT
(BY SHRI ARVIND SINGH - GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 309 OF 2016
BETWEEN :-
VIKRAM @ TAKKU@ VIKKI S/O
GAJENDRA MOURYA, AGED ABOUT
29 YEARS R/O NEAR GANDHI NAGAR
ITARSI TAHSIL ITARSI DISTRICT
HOSHANGABAD (M.P.)
.…APPELLANT
(BY SHRI AJAY JAIN -ADVOCATE )
AND
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
THROUGH P.S. ITARSI DISTRICT
HOSHANGABAD, (M.P.)
.….RESPONDENT
(BY SHRI ARVIND SINGH- GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE)
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 356 OF 2016
BETWEEN :-
1.
BABLU
@ SADA S/O
NARENDRA KEWAT, AGED 25 YEARS
R/O NEAR BALAGI MANDIR ITARSI
TAHSIL
ITARSI
DISTRICT
HOSHANGABAD, (M.P.)
Signed by: NAVEEN KUMAR
SARATHE
Signing time: 2/3/2023
5:25:13 PM
Signature Not Verified
3
Cr. A. Nos. 257 of 2016, 296 of 2016,
309 of 2016, 356 of 2016,
408 of 2016 & 709 of 2016
2.
GHANSHYAM @ BHEDA S/O
GOPAL PRASAD BASOD AGED 32
YEARS R/O RAMNAGAR NEW YARD
ITARSI TAHSIL ITARSI DISTRICT
HOSHANGABAD (M.P.)
3.
HITESH @ CHHOTA SANNI
MEHRA S/O SANTOSH MEHRA AGED
25 YEARS R/O GANDHI NAGAR
ITARSI TEHSIL ITARSI DISTRICT
HOSHANGABAD, (M.P.)
.…APPELLANTS
(BY MS. ANITA KAITHWAS - ADVOCATE )
AND
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
THROUGH P.S. ITARSI DISTRICT
HOSHANGABAD, (M.P.)
.….RESPONDENT
(BY SHRI ARVIND SINGH - GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE)
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 408 OF 2016
BETWEEN :-
SHANKAR MIHANI S/O KISHNA
CHAND MIHANI, AGED 51 YEARS R/O
NEAR BALAGI MANDIR ITARSI
TAHSIL
ITARSI
DISTRICT
HOSHANGABAD, (M.P.)
2. ANSHUL S/O MAHENDRA SEHGAL
AGED 34 YEARS R/O NEAR BALAGI
MANDIR ITARSI TAHSIL ITARSI
DISTRICT HOSHANGABAD, (M.P.) .
.…APPELLANTS
(BY SHRI SURENDRA SINGH SR. ADVOCATE WITH SHRI ASHWANI
DUBEY - ADVOCATE )
AND
Signed by: NAVEEN KUMAR
SARATHE
Signing time: 2/3/2023
5:25:13 PM
Signature Not Verified
4
Cr. A. Nos. 257 of 2016, 296 of 2016,
309 of 2016, 356 of 2016,
408 of 2016 & 709 of 2016
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
THROUGH P.S. ITARSI DISTRICT
HOSHANGABAD, (M.P.)
.….RESPONDENT
(BY SHRI ARVIND SINGH - GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE)
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 709 OF 2016
BETWEEN :-
DEEPAK @ GOLU GAJRAJ S/O
JAGDISH MEHTAR AGED ABOUT 34
YEARS R/O GANDHI NAGAR ITARSI
TAHSIL
ITARSI
DISTRICT
HOSHANGABAD, (M.P.)
.…APPELLANT
(BY SHRI R.S. YADAV - ADVOCATE )
AND
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
THROUGH P.S. ITARSI DISTRICT
HOSHANGABAD, (M.P.)
.….RESPONDENT
(BY SHRI ARVIND SINGH - GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reserved on
: 31/01/2023
Pronounced on
: 03/02/2023
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
These Criminal Appeals having been heard and reserved for
judgment, coming on for pronouncement this day, Justice Sujoy Paul
pronounced the following :
Anita Kaithwas,Advocate General
These batch of appeals are filed challenging the common
judgment passed in S.T. No. 169/2010 dated 05.01.2016 by learned
Sessions Judge, Hoshangabad whereby out of 15 accused persons, 4
were acquitted and 11 were convicted for committing offences under
5
Sections 302 read with 149 and 201 of the IPC. The accused persons
were convicted and sentenced by the trial Court as under -
Sr.
No.
Name of appellant Conviction under Section Sentence
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Bablu @ Sada
Pawan Mourya
Mukku @ Mukul
Ankur Mehta
Anshul Sehgal
Shankar Mihani
Sachin Binekia
Deepak @ Golu
Gajraj
Ghanshaym
@
Bheda
Tukku @ Vikram
@ Vikki
Hitesh @ Chhota
Sunni Mehra
302/149 (on two counts for
murdering Munnu @
Mrityunjay Upadhyay and
Sachin Tiwari)
Life imprisonment
with fine of Rs.
2,000/- and in
default to undergo
R.I. for three months
(on each count)
201 of IPC (on two
counts)
R.I. for 7 years with
fine of Rs. 2,000/-
and in default to
undergo R.I. for
three months (on
each count)
As per the case of prosecution, on 18.02.2010 near a marriage
hall, at Itarsi, the main accused Shankar Mihani along with other
accused persons pressurized Sachin Tiwari (deceased) to give an
affidavit in favour of accused Anshul. The friend of Sachin namely
6
Munnu @ Mritunjay opposed the same. Accused Anshul assaulted
Munnu by means of fists and quarrel began from this incident. During
altercation and exchange of heat, appellant Shankar Mihani directed
other accused persons to take Munnu and Sachin to Azad Panja
Crossing. Munnu and Sachin Tiwari were under the influence of liquor
and therefore they could not resist much. All the accused persons took
them on their foot to Azad Panja Crossing. Accused Golu Mehra
brought motorcycle of Munnu @ Mritunjay to Azad Panja Chowk. At
this place again Shanker Mihani pressurized Sachin to give an affidavit
in favoaur of accused Anshul. Sachin Tiwari and Munnu did not
succumb to such pressure. During heated altercation on this, all the
accused persons by means of sharp weapons assaulted Sachin and
Munnu. Munnu and Sachin died at Azad Panja Chowk. A person riding
a horse i.e. Gullu (PW-8) had seen the said incident. Shankar Mihani
directed other accused persons to bring that horse rider. Two accused
persons tried to bring the said person but their effort could not fetch
any result. Both the dead bodies were thrown in the field of Raja Patel.
Accused Takku had removed the chain from the neck of Munnu and
kept his purse with him.
Cr. A. No.408 of 2016 :
Contention of Appellant’s Counsel :
The story of prosecution further shows that Munnu left his house
on 18.02.2010 at around 7:30 PM but did not return back to his house
situated at Gandhi Nagar crossing. The family members unsuccessfully
tried to get information about him. Brother of Munnu, namely
7
Gyanendra Kishore Upadhayay lodged a missing person report on
19.02.2010 at Serial No. 20/10 in Roznamcha Sanha No. 1472. During
search of Munnu, his brother came to know that friend of Munnu,
Sachin Tiwari is also missing and did not return to his house. During
the search of both of them, their dead bodies were found near Boodhi
Mata Mandir road in the field of Rajesh Patel. The motorcycle of
Munnu was also found nearby. The FIR was registered against
unknown persons for committing offence under Section 302 read with
34 of IPC.
4.
The investigation was initially conducted by A.S.I. Ramkumar
Dhariya (PW-41). However, as submitted by learned Sr. counsel for the
appellant, midway, on verbal direction of Superintendent of Police
(SP), the investigation was handed over to A.S.I. Anil Bajpai (PW-40).
He conducted the investigation with effect from 24th Feb., 2010. This
new Investigating Officer Shri Bajpai recorded the statement of Manoj
Rajwanshi (PW-6) and Gullu @ Gaya Prasad (PW-8). On the basis of
statement of Manoj Rajwanshi (PW-6), a story of conspiracy inside
Hoshangabad Jail was prepared. It is alleged that main accused
Shankar Mihani was the mastermind of the conspiracy. However, co-
accused Pawan Raj and