M.A.No. 120 OF 2015
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAKASH CHANDRA GUPTA
ON THE 5th OF APRIL 2022.
MISC. APPEAL NO. 120 of 2015.
Between:-
1.
SATISHCHANDRA, AGED ABOUT 60
YEARS, S/O LATE RATANCHAND JAIN.
2.
CHAKRESH, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
S/O LATE RATANCHAND JAIN
BOTH R/O SANJAY WARD NO. 11,
NEAR SANJAY CHOURAHA TEHSIL-
PATHARIYA, DISTRICT DAMOH (M.P.).
(APPELLANTS)
(BY SHRI (Dr.) ANUVAD SHRIVASTAVA, ADVOCATE)
AND
GUDDAN @ DASHRATH, AGED ABOUT
34 YEARS, S/O MAHADEV PRASAD
CHOURASIYA, R/O SANJAY CHOURAHA,
TEHSIL PATHARIA, DISTRICT DAMOH,
(M.P.)
(RESPONDENT)
(BY SHRI SHASHANK PANDEY, ADVOCATE)
This appeal coming on for hearing this day, the court passed the
following:
M.A.No. 120 OF 2015
2
Anuvad Shrivastava,
With the consent of both the parties, this case has been heard and
decided finally.
1.
Appellants/plaintiffs have filed this miscellaneous civil appeal under
order 43 Rule 1(u) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, being aggrieved
and dissatisfied with the order dated 19/12/14 passed by the Additional
District Judge to the court of First Additional District Judge, Damoh in civil
Appeal no. 1-A/2014, whereby and whereunder the First Appellate Court set
aside the judgment and decree dated 18/12/13 passed by Civil Judge Class 2,
Pathariya, District- Damoh in civil suit no.32 A/2011 and remanded the
matter back to the learned trial Judge.
2.
The appellants /plaintiffs filed the suit before the trial court stating that
they have purchased the land, survey number 6/1 area 0.14 dismil on
12/01/62 situated in Pathariya Distt. Damoh from Pt Santosh Kumar Hajari
by a registered sale deed. Out of which plaintiff's house is built on 10 dismil
land. 4x20 square feet out of remaining 04 dismil unoccupied land of the
plaintiffs was taken by defendant on monthly rent of Rs 500 for the purpose
of running a shop. The defendant is in default of payment of 27 months rent
3
from January 2006 to 31/03/2008. Total Rs. 15,500/- is to be paid by the
respondent to the appellants.
3.
Despite the registered notice dated 01/02/08 served by plaintiffs to the
defendant to vacate the land and payment of the arrears of rent, the defendant
neither made the payment of arrears nor did he pass the vacant possession of
land to the plaintiffs, therefore plaintiffs brought the present suit against the
defendant for his eviction and recovery of arrears of rent.
4.
In written statement Respondent/defendant denied the facts of tenancy
and alleged that there lies no relationship of landlord and tenant between him
and the appellants with respect to the suit land. The notice dated 01/02/08
served by appellants to the respondent is illegal. Janpad panchayat is the
owner of the suit land. Defendant has been regularly paying the rent to the
Janpad panchayat, therefore respondent is the tenant of Janpad Panchayat.
Appellants want to take possession of the suit land from the respondent
forcefully. Appellants are not entitled to get possession of the suit land and
the suit is liable to be dismissed.
5.
The trial court framed five issues and after recording evidence of both
the parties, reached to the conclusion that the relationship of landlord and
tenant between the plaintiffs and defendant is not established but the trial
court has found proved that the plaintiffs are the owner of the suit land and
4
the possession of the respondent on the suit land amounts to encroachment,
therefore the plaintiffs are entitled to get vacant possession of suit land and
directed to the respondent to deliver the possession of suit land to the
appellants immediately, Accordingly the trial court has partly decreed the
suit.
6.
The respondent/ defendant has filed civil appeal before the appellate
Court which was registered as Civil Appeal No. 1-A/2014 challenging the
Judgment of the trial court on various grounds. The Lower Appellate Court
vide order dated 19/12/14 has remanded the matter to the trial Court, inter
alia with the following directions;
1. The trial court to direct the appellant/plaintiff to claim for
declaration of title. After the proper valuation of the suit,court fee be
paid accordingly.
2. Trial court also to direct that the Janpad Panchayat be made party
to the suit for the more elucidation of the case.
3. Trial court to direct both the parties to get the spot inspection done
for the clarity of location of the suit land.
4. For the above purposes the trial court to direct the parties to submit
an application and after the completion of the above process, take the
evidence of the parties interested to give the same and dispose the case
on merit.
7.
Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the learned First
Appellate Court has failed to appreciate that the trial court has not decided
civil suit merely on pr