1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
A T I N D OR E
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA
&
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR (VERMA)
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 557 of 2011
BETWEEN:-
AZAD S/O SUBHAN NAYATA, AGED ABOUT
33
YEARS,
OCCUPATION:
AGRI
VILL.BALODA
P.S.SADALPUR
TEH.AND
DISTT.DHAR (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....APPELLANT
(BY SMT. SHARMILA SHARMA - ADVOCATE)
AND
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH GOVT.
THROUGH P.S. SADALPUR, DISTT. DHAR
(MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENT
(BY SHRI AMIT SINGH SISODIA - GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE)
___________________________________________________________________
Reserved on
:
14/12/2022
Pronounced on
:
19/12/2022
________________________________________________________
This appeal having been heard and reserved for judgment, coming on
for pronouncement this day, JUSTICE SHRI VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA
pronounced the following:
Digitally signed by
SOUMYA RANJAN
DALAI
Date: 2022.12.20
16:28:11 IST
SAN
Signature Not Verified
2
The present appeal is filed under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal
Procedure being aggrieved by the judgment of conviction and sentence by 2nd
Additional Sessions Judge, Dhar dated 07.03.2011 in Sessions Trial
No.111/2010 whereby the appellant has been convicted under Section 302 of
the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as “IPC”) on two counts and
sentenced for life imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.1000/-in default to
further undergo six months RI for the murder of Rafique @ Rashid. He has
also sentenced for life imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.1000/-, in default
to further undergo 6 months RI for the murder of Ahsan. He has also convicted
under Section 27 of the Arms Act and sentenced to RI for 3 years and to pay a
fine of Rs.1000/-, in default to further undergo 6 months RI.
2.
The prosecution case in brief is that before 2 days back of the date
of the incident i.e. 10.12.2009, the appellant/accused Azad and his second wife
Pappi @ Rehana had quarrelled with Memuna, first wife of the appellant Azad
(P.W.1) and had beaten her in village Baloda. Because of the said Marpit with
her on 10.12.2009, Memuna telephoned her brother Ahsan and asked him to
come. Ahsan came to the house of accused Azad along with his cousin brother
Rashid. At 3 PM when they were talking with the appellant Azad, then
suddenly accused Azad got angry and rebuked Ahsan and said why he was
taking the side of his sister and slapped him. When Rashid tried to intervene,
the appellant also had beaten him. It is alleged that Pappi @ Rehana brought a
3
12 bore gun from inside the house and gave it to the appellant and asked him
to kill both of them. The appellant fired one bullet on the head of Ahsan and
second bullet hit his right shoulder. One bullet also hit mandible of Rashid.
Ahsan died on the spot. Upon the report of Memuna, Police Sadalpur registered
the offences under Section 302, 307 and 34 of Indian Penal Code and under
Section 25 of Arms Act in Crime No.310/2009 against the appellant and co-
accused Pappi @ Rehana. During the course of treatment, Rafique @ Rashid
also died on 11.12.2009. The police, Sadalpur arrested the appellant and co-
accused Pappi @ Rehana and after investigation filed the charge-sheet in the
Court. The appellant and co-accused Pappi @ Rehana abjured their guilt. The
learned trial Court after the trial acquitted the co-accused Pappi @ Rehana, but
convicted and sentenced the appellant as above.
3.
On the report of Memuna, a report was registered at Police Station
– Sadalpur vide Ex.P/1 by P.W.8 Devendra Singh Sengar, Thana In-charge,
Sadalpur. The post-mortem of both the dead bodies was carried out on
11.12.2009 by Dr. Narendra Pavaiya (PW-7). He opined that the deceased
Rafique @ Rashid died due to neuro-haemorrhagic wound caused by gun
injury within 24 hours. The said death was homicidal in nature. The post-
mortem report is Ex.P/14. Regarding the death of Ahsan, his post-mortem
report is Ex.P/15. It was opined that he died due to neuro-haemorrhagic shock
caused due to gun injury on heads and the said injury was caused within 24
hours of the examination. Devendra Singh Sengar (PW-8) prepared Naksha
4
Panchnama of dead body Ex.P/17 and Ex.P/18 is Naksha Mauka. From the
spot, the blood-stained clothes, soil, one empty 12 bore cartridge and other 12
cartridges, pallets, plastic pieces and paper weight etc were seized by seizure
memo Ex.P/11. The appellant and the other co-accused were arrested. On the
disclosure statement of appellant, motorcycle was seized vide Ex.P/1 and on
his statement, one 12 bore gun and cartridges were seized vide Ex.P/7. His gun
licence was seized vide Ex.P/10. All the seized articles were sent to FSL Sagar.
The FSL report is Ex.P/22 and the other reports are Ex.P/23 and P/24. The
prosecution case is based on testimony of eyewitnesses, seizure of gun and FSL
report. PW-1 Memuna, who is wife of appellant, deposed that the appellant had
brought her after performing Natra. She stayed with
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.