SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

A T I N D OR E

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA

&

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR (VERMA)

CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 557 of 2011

BETWEEN:-

AZAD S/O SUBHAN NAYATA, AGED ABOUT

33

YEARS,

OCCUPATION:

AGRI

VILL.BALODA

P.S.SADALPUR

TEH.AND

DISTT.DHAR (MADHYA PRADESH)

.....APPELLANT

(BY SMT. SHARMILA SHARMA - ADVOCATE)

AND

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH GOVT.

THROUGH P.S. SADALPUR, DISTT. DHAR

(MADHYA PRADESH)

.....RESPONDENT

(BY SHRI AMIT SINGH SISODIA - GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE)

___________________________________________________________________

Reserved on

:

14/12/2022

Pronounced on

:

19/12/2022

________________________________________________________

This appeal having been heard and reserved for judgment, coming on

for pronouncement this day, JUSTICE SHRI VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA

pronounced the following:

Digitally signed by

SOUMYA RANJAN

DALAI

Date: 2022.12.20

16:28:11 IST

SAN

Signature Not Verified

2

Advocates:
,A.G.

The present appeal is filed under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal

Procedure being aggrieved by the judgment of conviction and sentence by 2nd

Additional Sessions Judge, Dhar dated 07.03.2011 in Sessions Trial

No.111/2010 whereby the appellant has been convicted under Section 302 of

the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as “IPC”) on two counts and

sentenced for life imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.1000/-in default to

further undergo six months RI for the murder of Rafique @ Rashid. He has

also sentenced for life imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.1000/-, in default

to further undergo 6 months RI for the murder of Ahsan. He has also convicted

under Section 27 of the Arms Act and sentenced to RI for 3 years and to pay a

fine of Rs.1000/-, in default to further undergo 6 months RI.

2.

The prosecution case in brief is that before 2 days back of the date

of the incident i.e. 10.12.2009, the appellant/accused Azad and his second wife

Pappi @ Rehana had quarrelled with Memuna, first wife of the appellant Azad

(P.W.1) and had beaten her in village Baloda. Because of the said Marpit with

her on 10.12.2009, Memuna telephoned her brother Ahsan and asked him to

come. Ahsan came to the house of accused Azad along with his cousin brother

Rashid. At 3 PM when they were talking with the appellant Azad, then

suddenly accused Azad got angry and rebuked Ahsan and said why he was

taking the side of his sister and slapped him. When Rashid tried to intervene,

the appellant also had beaten him. It is alleged that Pappi @ Rehana brought a

3

12 bore gun from inside the house and gave it to the appellant and asked him

to kill both of them. The appellant fired one bullet on the head of Ahsan and

second bullet hit his right shoulder. One bullet also hit mandible of Rashid.

Ahsan died on the spot. Upon the report of Memuna, Police Sadalpur registered

the offences under Section 302, 307 and 34 of Indian Penal Code and under

Section 25 of Arms Act in Crime No.310/2009 against the appellant and co-

accused Pappi @ Rehana. During the course of treatment, Rafique @ Rashid

also died on 11.12.2009. The police, Sadalpur arrested the appellant and co-

accused Pappi @ Rehana and after investigation filed the charge-sheet in the

Court. The appellant and co-accused Pappi @ Rehana abjured their guilt. The

learned trial Court after the trial acquitted the co-accused Pappi @ Rehana, but

convicted and sentenced the appellant as above.

3.

On the report of Memuna, a report was registered at Police Station

– Sadalpur vide Ex.P/1 by P.W.8 Devendra Singh Sengar, Thana In-charge,

Sadalpur. The post-mortem of both the dead bodies was carried out on

11.12.2009 by Dr. Narendra Pavaiya (PW-7). He opined that the deceased

Rafique @ Rashid died due to neuro-haemorrhagic wound caused by gun

injury within 24 hours. The said death was homicidal in nature. The post-

mortem report is Ex.P/14. Regarding the death of Ahsan, his post-mortem

report is Ex.P/15. It was opined that he died due to neuro-haemorrhagic shock

caused due to gun injury on heads and the said injury was caused within 24

hours of the examination. Devendra Singh Sengar (PW-8) prepared Naksha

4

Panchnama of dead body Ex.P/17 and Ex.P/18 is Naksha Mauka. From the

spot, the blood-stained clothes, soil, one empty 12 bore cartridge and other 12

cartridges, pallets, plastic pieces and paper weight etc were seized by seizure

memo Ex.P/11. The appellant and the other co-accused were arrested. On the

disclosure statement of appellant, motorcycle was seized vide Ex.P/1 and on

his statement, one 12 bore gun and cartridges were seized vide Ex.P/7. His gun

licence was seized vide Ex.P/10. All the seized articles were sent to FSL Sagar.

The FSL report is Ex.P/22 and the other reports are Ex.P/23 and P/24. The

prosecution case is based on testimony of eyewitnesses, seizure of gun and FSL

report. PW-1 Memuna, who is wife of appellant, deposed that the appellant had

brought her after performing Natra. She stayed with

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top