SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 9662

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Pyare Lal & Ors – Appellant
Versus
Harishankar – Respondent


Advocates:
Naman Nagrath,Kn.Fakhruddin,Sanjeev Mishra,Ts.Ruprah,Harpreet Ruprah,P.Sen

JUDGMENT

This Second Appeal under Section 100 of CPC is preferred feeling aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 16.08.2001 passed by Additional District Judge, Begumganj, in Civil Appeal No.16-A/2000 arising out of judgment and decree dated 07.11.2000 in Civil Suit No.35-A/1988 by Civil Judge Class-I, Begumganj, Raisen.

2. Facts in brief are that respondent/plaintiff, Harishankar filed a suit for declaration and injunction regarding the land adjoining to the house of the plaintiff.

3. As per plaint, towards west side of the house of the plaintiff a Nala passes by and between the Nala and the wall of the plaintiff, common road passes through since many years. The case of the plaintiff was that the defendants were encroaching upon this common road. It was alleged in the plaint that the father of the appellants encroached upon this vacant land to set up small shop. The plaintiff alleged that the father of appellants/defendant were an influential person and after encroaching the plaint collected building material so as to construct a Pucca Hotel. Thus, the plaintiffs prayed for permanent injunction over the suit land and further prayed for injunction restraining the defendant/appella

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top