1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT JABALPUR
BEFORE
SHRI JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL
&
SHRI JUSTICE PRAKASH CHANDRA GUPTA
CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1079 OF 2015
BETWEEN :-
DEEPAK BELDAR S/O
BHAGWAN DAS, AGED
ABOUT 24 YEARS, R/O
VILLAGE
GAHLA,
DISTRICT HARDA (MP)
.…APPELLANT
(BY SHRI K.S.RAJPUT, ADVOCATE)
AND
STATE
OF
MADHYA
PRADESH,
THROUGH
POLICE
STATION
RAHATGAON,
DISTRICT
HARDA (MP)
….RESPONDENT
(BY SHRI A.S. BAGHEL, DEPUTY GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reserved on
:
30/6/2022
Delivered on
:
04/7/2022
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This criminal appeal coming on for hearing this day, Justice Sujoy
Paul, passed the following :
Kamal Singh Rajput,Advocate General
This is an appeal filed under Section 374 (2) of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, 1973 (In short “Cr.P.C) against the judgment dated
2
28/02/2015 passed in Sessions Trial No.58/2011 whereby the appellant
has been convicted under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code and directed
to undergo sentence of life imprisonment with fine of Rs.2000/-, with
default stipulation.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND :-
2.
The story of prosecution is that on 17/05/2011 at around 6 p.m., in
village Gahal Khedi road, the appellant assaulted deceased Sewantibai by
means of a knife thereby causing multiple injuries because of which she
died on the same day.
3.
As per the said story, on 17/05/2011, the deceased Sewantibai with
her sister-in-law Sewantibai went to Khedi road which was outside the
village Gahal Khedi for attending the natural call. Both of them were
sitting together for the said purpose by maintaining some distance. In the
meantime, the appellant Deepak Beldar came there and caught hand of
deceased Sewantibai with oblique motive and tried to take her to nearby
agricultural field. In order to save her, complainant Sewantibai shouted
and tried to save her. The appellant caused 2-3 knife injuries on the chest
of deceased Sewantibai. Out of fear, complainant Sewantibai came
running to her house shouting about the incident. The complainant
narrated the entire incident to her husband Poonam and brother-in-law
Bhagwandas and Ram. The said persons reached to the place of incident
and brought Sewantibai to the residence. At that point of time, Sewantibai
was unconscious and was profusely bleeding. She was taken to Harda
hospital by calling a Jeep from Dagawashankar. In the hospital, deceased
Sewantibai was declared as dead. Consequently, in Police Station
Rahatgaon, Crime No.105/2011 under Section 302 r/w 354 of IPC was
3
registered. During investigation, the statement of witnesses were recorded
and certain materials were seized. The appellant was arrested. The challan
was filed in the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Harda which on
committal came for trial before the Sessions Court.
4.
The appellant abjured the guilt and prayed for trial. His statement
was recorded. On behalf of prosecution, statements of Mangilal (PW-1),
Bhagwan Singh (PW-2), Smt. Laxmi Bai (PW-4), Pinaki More (PW-5),
Ramu (PW-6), Shankarlal (PW-7), Gopal (PW-8), Smt. Sewantibai (PW-
9), Poonam (PW-10), Vinod Kumar Ikka (PW-11), Dr. Bharat Katker
(PW-12), Lalsingh Patel (PW-13), Ajay Tiwari (PW-14), Dr. Rajesh
Mithoriya (PW-15), A.L. Chowkikar (PW-16), R.D. Berman (PW-17) and
Rakesh Kumar Gaur (PW-18) were recorded. In turn, appellant in his
defence statement recorded under Section 313 of Cr.P.C. denied the
allegations and projected himself to be an innocent person. However, no
defence witness was produced by him.
5.
The trial Court framed three questions and decided the same by the
impugned judgment dated 28/02/2015.
SUBMISSIONS :-
6.
Shri K.S.Rajput, learned counsel for the appellant submits that it is
a case of honour killing. The appellant had love affair with the deceased.
A day before the death of deceased, she was married against her wish
with Roshan. The appellant and deceased decided to leave the village
together and live separately. The family members of the deceased came to
know about this plan and, therefore, decided to murder the deceased. The
appellant has been falsely arraigned in the matter by the family members
of deceased.
4
7.
To bolster the said submission, learned counsel for the appellant
submits that sole eye witness is Sewantibai (PW-9). Her statement shows
that from the place where she went with deceased Sewantibai to attend
the call of nature, only one pot was recovered. She in her dehati nalisi
(Ex.P/2) and in her Court’s statement stated that appellant caused three
injuries on the chest of the deceased by means of a knife. However, post-
mortem report shows that nine injuries were found on the person of the
deceased. Thus, statement of this star witness Sewantibai is untrustworthy
and whol