IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT INDORE
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI
&
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRANAY VERMA
ON THE 23rd OF NOVEMBER, 2023
WRIT PETITION No. 26176 of 2023
BETWEEN:-
EQUITAS SMALL FINANCE BANK LIMITED THROUGH ITS
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY MR. SURYAKANT RAWAT S/O SHRI
MAHESH
CHANDRA
RAWAT,
AGED
ABOUT
28
YEARS,
OCCUPATION: SERVICE AUTHORIZED OFFICER REGD OFFICE
AT 4TH FLOOR PHASE 2 SPACE PLAZA 769 ANNASALAI CHENNAI
600002 AND BRANCH OFFICE AT PLOT NO. 28 EM 1 NEAR BSNL
TELEPHONE EXCHANGE SCHEME NO. 94 SECTOR E BENGALI
SQUARE INDORE 452016 (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....PETITIONER
(BY SHRI ROHIT SABOO, ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER)
AND
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY LAW
AND LEGISLATURE AFFAIRS VALLABH BHAWAN BHOPAL
(MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENT
(BY SHRI BHUWAN GAUTAM, GOVT. ADVOCATE FOR THE RESPONDENT)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reserved on : 12.10.2023
Pronounced on : 23.11.2023
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This petition having been heard and reserved for orders coming on for
pronouncement this day, Justice Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari passed the
following:
1
Signed by: SEHAR HASEEN
Signing time: 11/23/2023
4:53:39 PM
Signature Not Verified
Heard on the question of admission and interim relief.
The instant writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India has been
filed by the petitioner being aggrieved by the inaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate,
Khargone who is sitting tight over the application filed by the petitioner u/S 14 of the
Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security
Interest Act, 2002(referred to as"SARFAESI Act" hereinafter) praying for the following
relief:
"It is therefore prayed that for the peculiar facts contained herein and
ground raised, the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate be directed to register
the cases as listed in Annexure P-5 and dispose of then same within 30 days
as prescribed in law."
2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner is a banking company involved in
the business of advancing housing loans to its customers.The petitioner had filed an
application u/S 14 of the SARFAESI Act before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khargone
[referred to as CJM, Khargone" hereinafter]against one Mr. Badruddin & ors in the
month of December, 2022. The learned CJM, Khargone has neither registered the
application nor taken any steps to proceed in the matter and in contravention to the
provisions of Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, the CJM is listing the matter for
arguments on registration. Being aggrieved, the petitioner filed an application dated
08.09.2023 under the Right to Information Act, 2005 seeking status of all similar
SARFAESI Act matters pending before the CJM, Khargone which was forwarded by the
State Public Information Officer, Distt. & Sessions Court, Mandleshwar to the CJM who
has issued the list of cases u/S 14 of SARFAESI ACT pending before the CJM,
Khargone annexed with the petition. Now the present petition is preferred.
2
Signed by: SEHAR HASEEN
Signing time: 11/23/2023
4:53:39 PM
Signature Not Verified
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the CJM, Khargone has
failed to consider that the petitioner company is a secured creditor and the property in
question is secured by way of mortgage. The CJM exceeded its jurisdiction by listing the
cases u/S 14 of SARFAESI Act for the purpose of arguments on registration. In fact,
the CJM ought to have considered only two aspects:
(i) Determine whether the secured assets fall within its territorial jurisdiction?
(ii) Whether notice u/S 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act has been furnished or not?
4. In support of his contention, learned counsel for the petitioner relied on the
judgment passed by Single Bench of this Court in the case of Cholamandalam
Investments and Finance Ltd. Vs. Additional District Magistrate and Others
[2018(3) MPLJ 123] wherein , in para 20 it is held that :
20. "It has been held that the District Magistrate has to consider only
two aspects. He has to first determine whether the secured asset falls within
his territorial jurisdiction and secondly whether the notice under Section
13(2) has been furnished or not and no adjudication has been contemplated
at that stage."
5. He further relied upon the order passed by the Division Bench of this Court in
the case of HDFC Bank Ltd. Vs. Additional District Magistrate, Indore & Others
in W.P. No. 14976/2022.
6 . Learned counsel for the respondent/State submitted that petition may be
disposed of with directions to the CJM, Khargone to decide the applications filed u/S 14
of the SARFAESI Act within a time bound period.
7. Heard, learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
8. Before adverting to the relief sought in the petition, it is apt to go through the
provisions of Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act which are reproduced below for
3
Signed by: SEHAR HASEEN
Signing time: 11/23/2023
4:53:39 PM
Signature Not Verified
convenience:
9. Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act:
"14. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate or District Magistrate to assist
secured creditor in taking possession of secured asset.-
(1) Where the posse
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.