SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 37446

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
SHRI JUSTICE G. S. AHLUWALIA, J
Anusuiya – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Ravi Shankar Saini,Advocate General

Table of Content
1. counsel argued for condonation (Para 4)
2. court considered submissions (Para 5 , 6 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. court ruled on reasonable diligence (Para 7)
4. court affirmed dismissal of petition (Para 11 , 12)

ORDER

This petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed against order dated 13.08.2024 passed by SDO, Chhindwara in Revenue Case No.60/Appeal/2024-2025 and order dated 09.09.2024 passed by Collector, Chhindwara in Revision No.15/Revision/2024-25.

2. It is submitted by counsel for petitioner that petitioner had preferred an appeal before SDO, Chhindwara against order dated 27.11.1977 passed by Tahsildar, Tahsil Mohkhed. It is submitted that at the time of passing of impugned order, petitioner was minor and after attaining her age when she acquired the knowledge of said order, she preferred an appeal alongwith an application filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act . The SDO, Chhindwara by order dated 13.08.2024 rejected the application filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act and accordingly, the appeal was also dismissed as barred by time.

3. Being aggrieved by the said order, petitioner preferred a Revision, which too has been dismissed by Collecto

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top