SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Appellant
Versus
Dhanendra Lilhare – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate General,

1. As the both aforesaid Criminal Appeal No.4120/2020 and

M.Cr.C.No.32020/2020 arise of the same impugned judgment and order of

acquittal dated 04.12.2019 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class,

Varaseoni District- Balaghat whereby learned JMFC has acquitted the

respondents for the offence punishable under Sections 294, 323, 325, 506-II of

IPC, this order shall govern the disposal of both the case.

2. Heard on I.A.No. 11165/2020 (M.Cr.C.No.32020/2020), an

2

application for condonation of delay. This appeal has been filed with a delay of

12 days.

3. Having regard to the order dated 23.03.2020 passed in Suo-Motu Writ

Petition (Civil) No.(s).3/2020 in recognizance for extension of limitation by the

Hon'ble Apex Court, the delay caused in filing the appeal is ignored.

I.A.No.11165/2020 is disposed of accordingly.

372. No appeal to lie unless otherwise provided.- No appeal shall lie

from any judgment or order of a Criminal Court except as provided for by

this Code or by any other law for the time being in force;

Provided that the victim shall have a right to prefer an appeal against

any order passed by the Court acquitting the accused or convicting for a

lesser offence or imposing inadequate

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top