SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(MP) 11005

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Laxminarayan Patidar – Appellant
Versus
– Respondent


Advocates:
Ashish Goyal,Veena Mandlik

The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India

has been filed challenging the order dated 25.03.2022 passed under Section

148(A)(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act' for

brevity) and notice dated 27.03.2022 (Annexure P/4) issued under Section 148

of the Act.

1

Signed by: SREEVIDYA

Signing time: 12/6/2023

3:02:04 PM

Signature Not Verified

2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner seeks to challenge

the legality, validity and propriety of the notice dated 27.03.2022 issued under

Section 148 of the Act seeking to reopen the assessment for the Assessment

Year 2018-19 which is based on the order dated 25.03.2022 under Section

148(A)(d) of the Act issued by the respondent No.1. Both, the order and the

notice are illegal, without jurisdiction, arbitrary, in violation of the principles of

natural justice.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that despite absence

of any information suggesting that income chargeable to tax has escaped

assessment, the impugned order under Section 148A(d) has been passed

resulting in issuance of notice under Section 148 of the Act. He further argued

that without taking into account

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top