HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Laxminarayan Patidar – Appellant
Versus
– Respondent
The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
has been filed challenging the order dated 25.03.2022 passed under Section
148(A)(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act' for
brevity) and notice dated 27.03.2022 (Annexure P/4) issued under Section 148
of the Act.
1
Signed by: SREEVIDYA
Signing time: 12/6/2023
3:02:04 PM
Signature Not Verified
2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner seeks to challenge
the legality, validity and propriety of the notice dated 27.03.2022 issued under
Section 148 of the Act seeking to reopen the assessment for the Assessment
Year 2018-19 which is based on the order dated 25.03.2022 under Section
148(A)(d) of the Act issued by the respondent No.1. Both, the order and the
notice are illegal, without jurisdiction, arbitrary, in violation of the principles of
natural justice.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that despite absence
of any information suggesting that income chargeable to tax has escaped
assessment, the impugned order under Section 148A(d) has been passed
resulting in issuance of notice under Section 148 of the Act. He further argued
that without taking into account
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.