SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 8639

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Imarti Bai – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Rameshwar Singh Thakur,Advocate General

JUDGEMENT

1. This present appeal has been preferred against the judgment dated 29.08.2022 passed in S.T. No. 38/2017 by Ist Additional Sessions Judge Hatta, Distt. Damoh (M.P.) . By the impugned judgment trial Court convicted the appellant under Section 182 IPC and sentenced to undergo three months R.I. and fine of Rs. 200/- and under Section 211 of IPC and sentenced to undergo three years R.I. with fine of Rs. 2,000/- with default stipulation. 2. Prosecution story in brief is that on 28.01.2005 complainant (who is an accused in this case), resident of village Madia had given a written report that on 23.01.2005, she was forcibly raped by the Mahesh Bilthare of the village on the farm and he threatened to kill her if she reported the matter. On the report of complainant Crime No.19/2005 under Sections 376 and 506(B) of the Indian Penal Code was taken up in investigation.

3. In the office of the Sub-Divisional Officer, appellant presented an affidavit with her signature in which she had written that she does not want her genitals test. After not conducting the medical examination of the complainant, on 08.02.2005 before the Judicial Magistrate First Class,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top