SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 35920

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
JUSTICE SANJEEV S KALGAONKAR
Shadi Khan – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
,Advocate General

This Criminal Revision under Section 397 read with Section 401 of CrPC is directed against the order dated 07-07-2023 passed passed by Second Additional Sessions Judge, Joura, District Morena (MP) in Sessions Trial No.54 of 2023, whereby charges for offence punishable under Section 294 of IPC, Section 323 in the alternative Section 323 read with Section 34 of IPC (on three counts), Section 326 in the alternative Section 326 read with Section 34 of IPC and Section 506 Part- II of IPC are framed against the revision petitioners.

(2)The revision petition inter alia states as under:- (I) As per the case of prosecution on 30-05-2021 Roshan Goswami reported to PS Joura, District Morena that on same day around 09:00 in the morning, he went to his agricultural field near Alapur Canal. He saw that Shadi Khan, Balle Khan, Ragga Khan and Raju Khan (revision 3 petitioners) were placing boundary marks in his field. He and his son Ravi objected to placing boundary marks. All the accused started abusingthem in filthy language. They objected to abuses. Shadi Khan assaultedhim with wooden stick (danda). He sustained injury on left leg and left hand Balle Khan assaulted Ravi with da

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top