SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 11124

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Sachin Khatwani @ Sonu – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Siddharth Datt,Advocate General

ORDER

The applicant seeks anticipatory bail under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. in Crime No.18/2024, under Section 306/34 of IPC registered at Police Station Khajuri Sadak Bhopal, District Bhopal (M.P.)

On 26.04.2024 following order was passed:-

"The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C., in case bearing FIR/Crime No.18/2024, registered at Police Station Khajuri Sadak Bhopal, District Bhopal (M.P.), for the offence punishable under Signature Not Verified Section 306/34 of I.P.C.

Learned counsel for the petitioner with reference to the suicide note submits that even if suicide note is considered on its face value, no offence much less an offence under section 306 of IPC is attracted qua the complicity of the petitioner. Ingredients of section 306 of IPC are not attracted as there is no concerted effort on behalf of the petitioner to abet the commission of offence in any manner. The petitioner used to demand his own money and that lead to suicide of the deceased. The demand of the money by the petitioner does not satisfy the ingredient of offence under section 306 of IPC. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the wife of the petitioner is carrying 9 mont

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top