HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
VISHAL DHAGAT
Mahesh Matani – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
MCRC 9106/2024
BAIL - CORRUPTION - JOINT ACCOUNT HOLDER - NO OVERT ACT - DEPOSIT OF 50% OF DEFALCATED AMOUNT
Fact of the Case:
The applicant was arrested in connection with a case of cheating, forgery, and corruption. The allegations against him were that he had opened a joint account with the main accused and that an amount of Rs. One Crore had been credited into the account. The applicant claimed that he had no knowledge or intention to commit the crime and that he was not responsible for the cheating and forgery.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the applicant had been in jail for 10 months, that the investigation was complete, and that the applicant was ready to deposit 50% of the defalcated amount. The court also noted that the applicant had no overt act.
Issues: Whether the applicant should be granted bail.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the applicant was entitled to bail because he had been in jail for 10 months, the investigation was complete, and he was ready to deposit 50% of the defalcated amount.
Final Decision: The court allowed the applicant's bail application on the condition that he deposit Rs.50,00,000/- before the trial court.
ORDER
This is second bail application filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. on behalf of applicant who is in jail since 23.05.2023 in connection with Crime No.437/2021, registered at Police Station Vijay Nagar, District Jabalpur (M.P.) for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 120-B, 294, 506, 201 and 409 of IPC and Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submitted that applicant is in jail since last 10 months. Investigation is complete and charge sheet has been filed. As per allegations, an amount of Rs. One Crore has been credited in the joint account of applicant. Main accused in the case is Suresh Matani who is brother of applicant. Said accused alongwith bank officials are stated to have opened loan account and has later on withdrawn money from it. Applicant does not have any overt act. He cannot be held responsible for cheating and forgery if money is deposited in the joint account holder. To show his bonafide, applicant is ready to deposit 50% of the defalcated amount i.e. Rs.50,00,000/- before the trial court. In these circumstances, applicant may be enlarged on bail.
3. Learned Govt. Advocate appearing for the respondent/State opposed the bail application and submitted that applicant was joint account holder along with the main accused and it cannot be said that he does not have any knowledge or intention to commit the crime. In these circumstances applicant may not be enlarged on bail.
4. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 5. Investigation is complete and charge sheet has been filed. Applicant is in jail since last 10 months. He is ready to deposit 50% of the defalcated amount.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, bail application filed by the applicant is allowed on condition that applicant will deposit an amount of Rs.50,00,000/- (Rupees Fifty Lakhs) before the trial court.
7. On deposit of said amount, applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court for his regular appearance before Court on all such dates as may be fixed in this regard during pendency of trial.
8. The applicant shall also abide by the following conditions of Section 437 (3) of Cr. P. C. as under:- (a) that such person shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed under this Chapter;
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.