SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 35697

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
VISHAL DHAGAT
Shakti Choudhary – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Ghan Shyam Pandey,Advocate General

ORDER

This is sixth bail application filed by applicant under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail relating to Crime No.256/2022 registered at Police Station-Gwarighat District-Jabalpur (MP) for the offence under Sections 34(2), 42 of Excise Act.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submitted that applicant is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the case. Applicant is in jail since 04.07.2022. Counsel for applicant submitted that applicant cannot be kept in jail beyond a period of one-half of maximum term of imprisonment as per Section 436-A of Cr.P.C. In these circumstances, applicant may be released on bail.

3. Learned Government Advocate appearing for the State opposed the bail application. It is submitted that applicant is having criminal antecedents and as many as 24 cases are registered against him.

4. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 5. Applicant is repeatedly being involved in offence under the Excise Act. Applicant has committed as many as 24 offences after being released on bail.

Court may keep a person beyond aforesaid period assigning reasons. 24 offences committed by applicant one after another is enough for declining him the b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top