HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Neeta Tiwari – Appellant
Versus
Jitendra Kumar Tiwari – Respondent
ORDER
Learned counsel for respondent No.1 submits that respondent No.2- Shanti Sharma has already expired and her name has already been deleted from the cause title of the suit by order dated 23.03.2021.
2. At this stage, learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner prays for deletion of name of respondent No.2 from the cause title of present petition. 3. Prayer is allowed. 4. Necessary correction be made during the course of the day.
5. By the present petition, petitioner has challenged the order dated 07.02.2024 passed in RCSA No. 79/2019 by Second Civil Judge, Senior Division District-Umariya, whereby the application moved by petitioner under 14 Rule 5 of CPC was dismissed.
6. The short facts of the case are that the petitioner filed a suit for declaration and injunction against the defendants claiming that Late Shri Mukutdhari Sharma and Smt. Shanti Sharma adopted the petitioner during the lifetime of Shri Mukutdhari and, therefore, the petitioner is adopted daughter of the spouse. Respondent/Defendant No.1 Smt. Shanti Sharma sold the subjected property through registered sale deed to respondent/defendant No.1 Jitendra Kumar Tiwari and the sale deed is challenged by petit
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.