SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(MP) 3091

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Ramloutan Sahu – Appellant
Versus
Shobhnath Sahu – Respondent


Advocates:
Rakesh Kumar Sahu,

ORDER

Present appeal has been filed u/S.2(1) of M.P. Uchcha Nyayalaya (Khand Nyayapeeth Ko Appeal) Adhiniyam, 2005 (for brevity “Adhiniyam of 2005”) against final order dated 10.02.2023 passed in MP. No.5414/2018 by learned Single Judge dismissing said petition, which had been preferred against an order of Board of Revenue passed on

22.09.2018.

2. The objection raised by Registry of this Court is of maintainability of this appeal in view of bar in Section 2(1) of Adhiniyam of 2005.

2.1 The objection is that the power exercised by learned Single Judge was not in his original jurisdiction under Article 226 of Constitution but under supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 and, therefore, in view of the statutory bar, present appeal is not maintainable.

3. To counter the aforesaid objection, learned counsel for appellant, Shri Shah has relied upon decision of Apex Court in State of M.P. & Others vs. Visan Kumar Shiv Charan Lal reported in (2008) 15 SCC 233, which inter alia holds thus:- “17. From the aforesaid enunciation of law it is quite vivid and luminescent that the pleadings in the writ petition, nature of the order passed by the learned Single Judge, character and the contour of t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top