SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 10860

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Sumit Ranjan Jhira – Appellant
Versus
Prakash Jhira – Respondent


Advocates:
Dr. Anuvad Shrivastava,

ORDER

By the present petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 3.1.2024 passed in C.S. No.6-A/2019 by IInd Civil Judge, Senior Division, Narsinghpur whereby the objections submitted by the petitioner upon Commissioner's report dated 24.8.2023 were rejected by the learned trial court.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that upon the application moved by the petitioner/plaintiff under Order 26 Rule 9 of the CPC, the writ of commission was issued by the learned trial court and the Commissioner conducted the measurement and demarcation of spot and submitted his report. At the time of measurement of spot, the petitioner raised objection that the Commissioner has not measured the property on the ground and the same has been measured from the roof and therefore, the measurement is not correct. The Commissioner has noted down objection raised by petitioner on spot memo itself. On the report of the Commissioner, the petitioner filed an objection and thereafter the Commissioner was examined in the court and was cross examined by the petitioner also.

3. Learned trial court by impugned order dated 3.1.2024 rejected the objection raised by the petitioner

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top