-( 1 )- CRA No. 202/2012
Gudda @ Lal Sahab & Ors. vs. State of MP
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
BENCH AT GWALIOR
DIVISION BENCH
BEFORE: G.S.AHLUWALIA
AND
RAJEEV KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA, JJ.
Criminal Appeal No.202/2012
1. Gudda @ Lal Sahab S/o Sukhua Jatav
2. Sangram Singh S/o Sukhua Jatav
3. Kutaria S/o Sukhua Jatav
4. Kaptan S/o Sukhua Jatav
All residents of Akai Mahadev, P.S. Badarwas
District Shivpuri (MP)
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh
Through Police Station Badarwas
District Shivpuri (MP)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shri S.S. Gautam, Counsel for appellants.
Shri C.P. Singh, Counsel for State.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reserved on
:
10th November, 2021
Whether approved for reporting:
Yes
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
S.S.Gautam,P.Shrivastava,Advocate General
(Delivered on 24/11/2021)
Per Rajeev Kumar Shrivastava, J.:
1.
The instant Criminal Appeal is preferred under Section 374
of CrPC, against the judgment of conviction and sentence dated
8-2-2012 passed by IInd Additional Sessions Judge, District
Shivpuri in Sessions Trial No. 63/2011, whereby appellants have
been convicted under Sections 302 read with Section 34 of IPC,
Section 324 read with Section 34 of IPC and Section 323 read
with Section 34 of IPC and sentenced to undergo life
-( 2 )- CRA No. 202/2012
imprisonment with fine of Rs.4000/- each for the offence under
Section 302/34 of IPC, in default of payment of fine, to undergo
RI for one year each, and for the offence under Section 324/24 of
IPC, to undergo 6 months RI each with fine of Rs.700/- each, in
default of payment of fine, to undergo RI for one month each, and
under Section 323/34 of IPC, to undergo RI for three months each
with fine of Rs.300/- each, in default of payment of fine, to
undergo rigorous imprisonment of 15 days each. All the sentences
were directed to run concurrently.
2.
The brief facts of the case are that complainant Rambali
Jatav lodged FIR alleging that on 26.01.2011 at around 6.00 pm,
he along with Ramveer (deceased) was coming back from their
fields to their house and complainant's Bhabhi Rambai was
coming after attending the call of nature, when they reached in
front of the house of Kutaria, the accused persons Kaptan, Kutaria,
Gudda and Sangram, who were armed with luhangi, axe, lathi and
farsa reached there, on that he asked why they had brought their
grass, however, all of them attacked him with luhangi, axe, lathi &
farsa. When Ramveer (deceased) & Rambai tried to save him, all
the accused persons attacked upon them with luhangi, axe and
farsa and caused serious injuries to them, as a result of which
deceased Ramveer sustained injuries on his head, face and
forehead, whereas Rambai also suffered injuries on her right hand
with lathi. Thereafter, his father Bhola as well as Devendra &
Parbati came to rescue them from the accused persons. The FIR
was registered for commission of offence under Sections 307, 324
& 323 of IPC. During the treatment, Ramveer succumbed to his
injuries, on that, the offence under Section 302 of IPC was
enhanced.
3.
After completion of investigation, the charge sheet was filed
-( 3 )- CRA No. 202/2012
for commission of offence under Sections 302, 307, 324, 323 read
with Section 34 of IPC. Charges under Sections 302/34, 307/34
(Kaptan u/S 307), 323, 341 & 323/34 IPC were framed against the
accused-appellants to which, they pleaded not guilty and claimed
trial.
4.
In the statements recorded under Section 313 of Cr.P.C. the
accused/appellants have stated that in the incident the complainant
party was aggressor. They entered into the house of the accused-
appellants and caused injuries to them. The accused-appellants
were medico-legally examined. Accused-appellants Sangram
Singh, Kutaria and Kaptan have taken the plea of alibi.
5.
Before the trial Court prosecution examined Rambali (PW-
1), Arjun (PW/2), Devendra (PW/3), Bholaram (PW/4), Rambai
(PW/5), Dr. R.R. Mathur (PW/6), Dr. Seema Shakya (PW/7), Dr.
A.P. Sengar (PW/8), Bharosa Ram (PW/9), Prahlad Singh Patwari
(PW/10), Kailash Sharma, ASI (PW/11), Gurubachan Singh, TI
(PW/12), Ashok Sharma, Head Constable (PW/13) and accused
persons in their defence examined Anita (DW/1) and Kanhaiya
(DW/2) and proved the contents of Ex-D-1 to Ex-D-5.
6.
Learned trial Court after appreciation of evidence available
on record convicted and sentenced the appellants as under :-
Name of
accused
Section
Punishment
Fine
In default,
punishment
Kaptan
302/34 IPC Rigorous
Imprisonment for
life
4000/- One year
RI
324 IPC
6 months RI
700/- One
Months RI
323/34 of
IPC
3 months RI
300/-
15 days RI
Kutaria
302/34 IPC Rigorous
Imprisonment for
4000/- One year
RI