IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK AGARWAL
ON THE 18th OF AUGUST, 2022
MISC. APPEAL No. 2859 of 2014
Between:-
HDFC ERGO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
LTD. ITS MANAGER D.M. TOWER FLAT NO. 10
205, 206, SECOND FLOOR, NEW PALASIA ROAD,
INDORE, M.P. (THROUGH ITS MANAGER)
.....APPELLANT
(BY SHRI RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, ADVOCATE)
AND
1.
SMT. BISRATI BAI WD/O LATE VEERAN SINGH,
AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS
2.
KRISHNA KUMAR S/O LATE VEERAN SINGH,
AGED ABOUT 4 YEARS
3.
LAXMAN KUMAR S/O LATE VEERAN SINGH,
AGED ABOUT 3 YEARS
4.
LAXMI BAI S/O LATE VEERAN SINGH, AGED
ABOUT 3 YEARS
RESP NO.2, 3 AND 4 ARE MINOR THROUGH
GUARDIAN MOTHER SMT. BISRATI BAI, WD/O
LATE VEERAN SINGH
5.
SMT. PANE BAI WD/O LATE BHANGI LAL, AGED
ABOUT 55 YEARS
ALL R/O GRAM POTALAL (MAJHGAON), POLICE
STATION-
TIKARIA
THSIL
NIWAS,
DISTT-
MANDLA, M.P.
6.
MANGAL SINGH ULADI S/O SHRI S.R. ULADI,
AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS, R/O GRAM KUMHA,
TEHSIL NIWAS
........VEHICLE DRIVER
7.
JAWAHAR SINGH S/O SHRI KUNWAR SINGH
R/O GRAM MAJHGAON, POST NARAYANGANJ
1
Digitally signed by MOHD TABISH KHAN
Date: 2022.09.01 20:10:43 IST
SAN
Signature Not Verified
TEHSIL NIWAS, DISTT- MANDLA
8.
SMT. SHAKUN BAI W/O MUKUNDI LAL SAHU
R/O GRAM KARARI, TEHSIL PATAN DISTT-
JABALPUR, M.P.
.....RESPONDENTS
(BY SHRI DEVENDRA SINGH BAGHEL, RESPONDENT NO.8)
This appeal coming on for hearing this day, th e court passed the
following:
Heard on I.A. No.2400/2015, an application seeking condonation of
delay in filing of the appeal.
It is mentioned that there is delay of 61 days in filing this appeal.
For the reasons stated in the application, I.A. No.2400/2015 is allowed
and the delay in filing the appeal is hereby condoned.
This Miscellaneous Petition is filed by the Insurance Company being
aggrieved of award dated 19.07.2014 passed by learned Second Additional
Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mandla in Claim Case No.74/2009 (Smt.
Bisrati Bai and Others Vs. Mangal Singh Uladi and others) on two grounds
namely that the thresher attached to the insured tractor bearing registration
No.MUJ-2274 was not separately insured and was used for commercial
purpose.
It is submitted that driver of the tractor was having learner license and
not the regular license, therefore, Insurance company should have been
exonerated.
It is also submitted that compensation awarded under non pecuniary
heads be reduced as per schedule attached to Section 163-A of Motor Vehicle
Act.
2
Reliance is placed on the judgment of a Coordinate Bench of this High
Court in case of Manglesh S/o Chironji Namdeo Vs. Jaykishan (since
dead) through L.Rs. and another, 2022(2) MPLJ, 550 where it is held that
since thresher was not insured, in absence of Insurance Policy for thresher,
insurer is not liable to satisfy the award and owner of the thresher will be liable
to satisfy the award.
Learned counsel for respondents No.1 and 8, in his turn, submits that
there is no illegality in the impugned award calling for any interference.
After hearing learned counsel for the parties and going through the
record, it is evident that four grounds have been raised by the learned counsel
for the Insurance Company namely; Non Insurance of thresher, secondly, use
of the thresher for commercial purpose as it was used in the field of somebody
else, thirdly; driver of the insured tractor was having learners license and
fourthly; non pecuniary amount of compensation should be as per schedule
attached to Section 163-A.
As far as, last ground is concerned that needs to be rejected and is
rejected because claim petition was filed under Section 166 and not under
Section 163-A, therefore, schedule under Section 163-A will not have any
meaning and application.
As far as, issue of learner's license is concerned, Section 2(19) of the
Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 provides that "learner's license" means the license
issued by a competent authority under Chapter II authorising the person
specified therein to drive as a learner, a motor vehicle or a motor vehicle of any
specified class or description.
Thus, it is not evident from the evidence lead by the Insurance Company
that there was any violation of the terms and conditions of the learner's license.
3
In fact, witness of the Insurance Company Ramraj Vishwakarma, Manager,
claims, admitted in his cross-examination that though company got investigation
carried out but no investigation report was filed on record. He admits that he
has not produced any document to show either commercial use of the Tractor
or any violation of the terms and conditions of the policy, therefore, issue of
tractor being driven by a person holding learner's license looses its sheen,
specially when it is shown that driver was not accompanied with a duly license
regular driver, thus these two arguments namely person driving it with learner's
license and Tractor being used for commercial purpose are not made out.
The only question which now survives for adjudication is whether it is
necessary to have separate insurance for the thresher.
As far as, thresher is concerned, it is a piece of farm equipment that
threshes green, i.e., it removes the seed from stalks and husks by beating the
plant to make a seed fall out.
The Division Bench of this High Court in case of National Insurance
Company Ltd., Indore Vs. Kanha and another, 2008 SCC Online 710
has held that if the accident occurred while the tractor is in operation then the
risk of insured is covered if any person whethe
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.