HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VISHAL DHAGAT
Kamlesh – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER
This is the first bail application filed on behalf of the applicants/accused under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail, as they are under apprehension of their arrest, in connection with Crime No.234/2024 registered at Police Station Bareli District Raisen (M.P.) for the offences punishable under Sections 294, 327, 323, 506, 34 of the IPC.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the applicants submitted that no extortion has been committed by applicant. False allegations were made that applicants demanded money for drinking liquor. Applicants are infact Dhaba owner. Complainant visited their Dhaba for eating food. There was some altercation and later on assault took place. At the best offence under section 325 of the IPC will be made out.
3. Learned Govt. Advocate appearing for the State opposed the application for grant of anticipatory bail. It is submitted that one police man and complainant was assaulted by applicants. Applicants are habitual offenders and having criminal records. In CCTV footage, applicants can be seen. 4. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
5. Applicants is said to have assaulted with Lathi, which has caused fracture. Said incident will
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.