SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 4076

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA, J
Vicky – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
MCRC 14133/2024



Advocates:
,Advocate General

The court found no prima facie case for abetment of suicide, allowing bail based on completed investigation and custody duration.

Headnote:(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 439 - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 306, 34 - Bail application - The applicant sought bail in connection with a suicide case where allegations were made against him for abetting the suicide of the deceased - The applicant has been in custody since 7.12.2023, and the investigation is complete with a charge sheet filed - The court found that prima facie case for abetment was not established based on the suicide note and other evidence - The application for bail was allowed. (Paras 1-4)

(B) Bail - Considerations for granting bail - The court emphasized that the applicant is entitled to bail given the completion of the investigation and the absence of a prima facie case for abetment of suicide. (Paras 3-4)

Facts of the case:
The applicant was accused of abetting the suicide of Pankaj, who allegedly faced harassment from the applicant and others regarding his inter-caste relationship with Rekha, leading to his suicide by hanging. The applicant has been in custody since December 2023.

Findings of Court:
The court determined that the applicant is entitled to bail due to the completion of the investigation and lack of a prima facie case for abetment.

Issues: The main issue was whether the applicant's actions constituted abetment of suicide as alleged in the suicide note.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the evidence presented did not establish a prima facie case for abetment of suicide, allowing for the grant of bail.

Result: Bail application allowed.

ORDER

This is second application under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. filed on behalf of the applicant in connection with Crime No.363/2023 registered at Police Station Jeeran, Distt. Neemuch (M.P.) under Sections 306, 34 of IPC. The first bail application was dismissed as withdrawn on 9.2.2024 in M.Cr.C. No.5855/2024. As per prosecution story, on dated 18/1 1/2023, police received murg intimation from Civil Hospital, Neemuch about one deceased Pankaj who has committed suicide by hanging at his house. Upon the said information, police registered murg intimation number 76/2023 and investigated the matter. During investigation, police seized one suicide note from the spot and also recorded statements of deceased’s parents, siblings, relatives and other witnesses wherein it came on record that deceased Pankaj has leveled allegations against total 06 accused persons including the present applicant. Police further found out that deceased Pankaj was in love affair with one Rekha and both wanted to marry with each other. However, accused persons including the present applicant and the family members of Rekha were not in favour of this inter-caste relationship and they used to harass the deceased with threats of damaging the reputation of himself and the girl. Due to this continuous mental and physical harassment and torture, deceased committed suicide by hanging at his house leaving behind a suicide note. Thereafter, police registered crime against accused person and arrested the present applicant.

Counsel for applicant submits that the applicant is in jail since 7.12.2023. The investigation is complete, charge sheet has been filed. It is submitted that even if accepting the averments made in the suicide note, no prima facie case for abatement to commit suicide is made out.

Counsel for State opposed the prayer and submits that the deceased had made a complaint and call details and messages are available which establishes that the applicant was threatening the deceased for having love affair with the girl.

After hearing learned counsel for parties and taking into consideration that the applicant is in jail since 7.12.2023, the investigation has been completed, charge sheet has been filed, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled for grant of bail. Therefore, without expressing any view on the merits of the case, the application is allowed.

It is directed that Applicant shall be released from custody upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Ld. Court below. It is further made clear that if it is found that the applicant is involved in any other case during the trial, this bail order shall stand cancelled automatically without reference to the Court and the Police will be at liberty to arrest the applicant.

A typed copy of this order is being forwarded to the Office of the Advocate General, on their email address, for intimation to the Police Station concerned. The office is requested to forward a copy of this order to the Ld. Court below.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top