SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(MP) 3353

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Ashutosh Khare – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Praveen Dubey,

ORDER

This petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed against order of transfer dated 25.07.2023 passed by respondent No.2 in File No.3829/NREGS-MP/NR-2/Sth./NR-2/2023 and order dated 06.09.2023 passed by respondent No.2 in File No.5255/NREGS-MP/NR-2/Sth./2023 by which representation made by petitioner against transfer order has been rejected.

2. It is the case of petitioner that by order dated 25.07.2023 petitioner, who is working on the post of Account Officer (Contract) was transfer from District Katni to District Shahdol with a direction to execute a new agreement at Shahdol. Petitioner has been working on the present place of posting since 2007 and no one has been posted. Petitioner is not surplus and therefore, there is no question of rationalisation. However, under the guise of administrative exigency, petitioner, who is a contractual employee having meager salary has been transferred to a new place which is Shahdol which will require petitioner to shift alongwith entire family set up at his own expenses as like any other regular employee he is not entitled for regular service benefits like HRA etc. Since petitioner was aggrieved by his transfer order d

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top