Back
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
G.S. AHLUWALIA, J
Kalpana Daniel – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. fir filed against applicant (Para 2) |
| 2. counsel for applicant's submission (Para 3 , 4 , 6) |
| 3. opposition by state counsel (Para 5) |
| 4. definition of child in need (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. question of care and protection (Para 9 , 10) |
| 6. children's status in institution (Para 11) |
| 7. writ petition relevance (Para 12 , 13) |
| 8. details of rescued children (Para 14) |
| 9. registration necessity upheld (Para 15) |
| 10. investigation into additional offences (Para 16) |
| 11. judicial oversight principles (Para 17 , 18) |
| 12. application dismissed (Para 19 , 20) |
ORDER
Case diary is available.
2. This application under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. has been filed seeking following relief(s):-
―It is therefore most humbly and respectfully prayed that FIR has been filed by instruction of Madhya Pradesh Commission for Protection of Child Rights which is illegal, all section which was made out also irrelevant all the ground and facts available on record the said FIR may be Quashed. In the interest of justice, this present petition may kindly be allowed and the quash the Impugned FIR in Crime no.0367/23 in P.S Jobat Dist. – Alirajpur (M.P.).‖
3. It is submitted by counsel for the applicant that one Kalu Singh, who was p
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
