Back
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK RUSIA, SHRI JUSTICE BINOD KUMAR DWIVEDI, JJ
Ajay Singh & Ors. – Appellant
Versus
The State Of M.P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. witness testimonies and evidence (Para 3) |
| 2. autopsy findings (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. recovery of evidence (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. defense claims and contradictions (Para 11) |
| 5. prosecution's evidence reliability (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 6. witness credibility assessment (Para 15) |
| 7. legal principles on circumstantial evidence (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38) |
| 8. appeal outcome (Para 39 , 40 , 41) |
JUDGMENT
Per: Justice Binod Kumar Dwivedi
This appeal under Section 374 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Cr.P.C.') has been preferred against the judgment dated 01.02.2003 in S.T.No.690/2000, whereby Learned Additional Sessions Judge, Indore has convicted the appellants for offence under Sections 148 , 302 /149 of IPC , Section 25(1)(b) and 27 of the Arms Act, 1959 and sentenced to undergo 3 Years R.I., life imprisonment with fine of Rs.5,000/-, 1 year R.I.with fine of Rs.1,000/-, 7 years R.I. with fine of Rs.1,000/- for each offence respectively with default stipulation.
2. It is not in dispute that appellants and prosecution witnesses Babu (PW-1), Shankar (PW-2), Dilip
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
