SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(MP) 6003

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Bhagwandas – Appellant
Versus
Panpati Shah – Respondent


Advocates:
Janak Lal Soni,

This criminal Revision has been preferred by the petitioner being

aggrieved by the impugned order dated 25.03.2022 passed by learned Principal

Judge Family Court, Singrauli, in MJCR No. 120/2018 whereby the application

under Section 125 Cr.P.C. filed by the respondent/wife has been partly allowed

and the petitioner/husband has been directed to pay Rs.10,000/- per month to

the respondent/wife from the date of application dated 27.09.2018.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the marriage of the petitioner/husband and

respondent/wife has been solemnized on 29.03.2017 as per the Hindu rites and

rituals at Amlori Shishu Mandir under the Mukhya Mantri Kanya Daan Yojana.

Since the date of marriage, petitioner started to make pressure on the respondent

to bring dowry from her parental home and when she denied, petitioner started

to torture her and lastly he oust the respondent from his house on 11.08.2017.

When no ground was left, respondent/wife file an application under Section 125

Cr.P.C. before the learned Principal Judge Family Court, Singrauli (M.P.) as

MJCR No. 120/2018 which was partly allowed vide order dated 25.03.2022,

directing the petitioner/husband to pay Rs.10,000/- per

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top