SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 20175

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
SHRI JUSTICE PREM NARAYAN SINGH, J
Amjad Khan – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
MCRC 6958/2024



Advocates:
Anuj Bhargava,Advocate General

Bail may be granted based on the circumstances of the case, including the duration of custody and compromises reached, without commenting on the merits.

Headnote:(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 439 - Bail application - Third bail application filed for grant of bail in relation to Crime/FIR No.470/2023 under Section 420 of IPC - Applicant in custody since 19.05.2023 - Previous bail applications withdrawn - Allegations of forgery against applicant - Complainants have compromised the case - Trial Court discharged applicant from charges under Sections 467, 468, and 471 of IPC - Conclusion of trial expected to take a long time. (Paras 1-5)

(B) Bail - Grant of bail is considered based on the facts and circumstances of the case, including the period of custody and the nature of allegations - The court may allow bail if it finds sufficient grounds, without commenting on the merits of the case. (Paras 5-6)

Facts of the case:
The applicant was arrested for alleged forgery under Section 420 of IPC and has been in custody since May 19, 2023. Previous bail applications were either withdrawn or dismissed with liberty to reapply. The complainants have reached a compromise with the applicant, leading to the discharge from certain charges.

Findings of Court:
The court found sufficient grounds to grant bail based on the custody period and the compromise reached with complainants.

Issues: The main issue was whether the applicant should be granted bail considering the circumstances of the case and the compromise with complainants.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the applicant may be released on bail due to the circumstances of the case, including the compromise and the duration of custody, without commenting on the merits of the case.

Result: Bail application allowed.

ORDER

Heard and perused the record.

This is the THIRD bail application filed on behalf of the applicant under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of bail. The applicant is arrested in relation to Crime/FIR No.470/2023, registered at Police Station- Kishanganj, District-Indore for the offence under Section 420 of IPC. Applicant is in custody since 19.05.2023. His first bail application was rejected as simply withdrawn and second bail application was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh after four months. Now, the aforesaid period is over, hence, the present petition has been filed by the applicant.

2. As per prosecution story, the allegations against the applicant is that he has committed forgery with the complainants.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The applicant is in jail since 19.05.2023. It is also submitted that all the complainants have already compromised the case with the present applicant and on the basis of said compromise, the learned trial Court has discharged the petitioner from the charged under Section 467, 468 and 471 of IPC. The case is triable by Judicial Magistrate First Class and conclusion of trial will take sufficient long time.

Under these circumstances, counsel prays for grant of bail to the applicant.

4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer and prayed for its rejection. However, Shri A.S. Rathore, learned counsel for the complainant appearing in connected CRR No.5654/2023 filed on behalf of the complainant has admitted that the compromise has been arrived at between the applicant and complainants.

5. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and custody period, I am of the view that it is a case, in which applicant may be released on bail. Consequently without commenting on the merits of the case, first bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of bail filed on behalf of applicant, stands allowed.

6. It is directed that applicant be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty thousand only) with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court, for his regular appearance before the trial Court during trial with a condition that he shall remain present before the concerned Court on all the dates fixed by it during trial. He shall abide by all the conditions enumerated under Section 437 (3) of Cr.P.C . 7. This order shall be effective till the end of the trial. However, in case of bail jump and breach of any of the conditions of bail, it shall become ineffective.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top