HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Narayan Prasad Patel – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER
The present petition has been filed challenging the dispossession notice dated 16.02.2024 issued by respondent No.2 whereby the respondent No.2 has intimated that the petitioner is in unauthorized possession of government land in Survey No.248 and explanation has been called why he should not be forcefully dispossessed and why order for civil jail be not passed against him.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that earlier also similar notice was issued to the petitioner alleging that he is in possession of government land in Survey Nos.225, 249 and 248 but actually he is in possession of Survey No.250. It is further contended that the Civil Court has already passed the injuction order in favour of the petitioner on 22.12.2023 but still the respondents are issuing repeated notice.
3. On perusal of the record, it is apparent that the petitioner had filed reply to the show cause notice and it seems to be pending before the respondent No.2.
4. Considering the aforesaid situation, I am inclined to direct the respondent No.2 to take the said reply into consideration and pass specific order thereon (if not already passed) before proceeding further. In case any adverse ord
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.