SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 20886

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Narayan Prasad Patel – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Bhoop Singh Patel,Advocate General

ORDER

The present petition has been filed challenging the dispossession notice dated 16.02.2024 issued by respondent No.2 whereby the respondent No.2 has intimated that the petitioner is in unauthorized possession of government land in Survey No.248 and explanation has been called why he should not be forcefully dispossessed and why order for civil jail be not passed against him.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that earlier also similar notice was issued to the petitioner alleging that he is in possession of government land in Survey Nos.225, 249 and 248 but actually he is in possession of Survey No.250. It is further contended that the Civil Court has already passed the injuction order in favour of the petitioner on 22.12.2023 but still the respondents are issuing repeated notice.

3. On perusal of the record, it is apparent that the petitioner had filed reply to the show cause notice and it seems to be pending before the respondent No.2.

4. Considering the aforesaid situation, I am inclined to direct the respondent No.2 to take the said reply into consideration and pass specific order thereon (if not already passed) before proceeding further. In case any adverse ord

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top