SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 20327

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT INDORE

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK RUSIA

ON THE 22nd OF APRIL, 2024

WRIT PETITION No. 10820 of 2024

BETWEEN:-

1.

GIRJESH S/O SHRI MADANLAL BANASIYA, AGED

ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURE

623, MAIN ROAD SHANTIPUR UJJAIN, DIST.

UJJAIN (MADHYA PRADESH)

2.

MADAN LAL S/O SHRI SIDDHNATH, AGED ABOUT

65

YEARS, OCCUPATION: AGRICUTLURE 623,

MAIN ROAD SHANTIPUR UJJAIN, DIST. UJJAIN

(MADHYA PRADESH)

.....PETITIONER

( BY SHRI GOURAV SHRIVASTAVA-ADVOCATE)

AND

1.

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH ITS

PRINCIPAL

SECRETARY

VALLABH

BHAWAN

BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)

2.

COLLECTOR UJJAIN

DISTRICT

(MADHYA

PRADESH)

3.

SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE UJJAIN DISTRICT

UJJAIN (MADHYA PRADESH)

4.

JILA PANCHAYAT UJJAIN THROUGH ITS CHIEF

EXECUTIVE

OFFICER DIST. UJJAIN (MADHYA

PRADESH)

5.

JANPAD PANCHAYAT UJJAIN THROUGH ITS

CHIEF

EXECUTIVE

OFFICER DIST.

UJJAIN

(MADHYA PRADESH)

6.

GRAM PANCHAYAT LAKHODA THROUGH ITS

SARPANCH

AND

SACRATORY GRAM

PANCHAYAT,

GRAM

LAKODA

DIST.

UJJAIN

(MADHYA PRADESH)

1

Signed by: PRAVEEN

Signing time: 25-04-

2024 17:36:12

Signature Not Verified

.....RESPONDENTS

This petition coming on for orders this day, th e court passed the

following:

Advocates:
Gourav Shrivastava,Advocate General

ORDER

The petitioners have filed the present Writ Petition being aggrieved by the notice dated 17.04.2024 whereby Sarpanch and Secretary of the Gram Panchat Lakoda, District Ujjain directed them to submit a documents pertaining to the ownership, building permission within three days.

2. The petitioners submitted these documents alongwith reply dated 19.04.2024. Now the petitioners are apprehending the demolition of the portion of the house by the Gram Panchayat. However, till today the Gram Panchayat has not passed any final order in respect of the notice dated 17.04.2024.

3. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that under Section 56 of M.P. Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, the Gram Panchayat is not competent to demolish the property or remove the encroachment. The Gram Panchayat by way of resolution can request to Tehsildar to remove hindrances/obstructions/ encroachment.

4. The aforesaid contention is not acceptable because as per the proviso of sub section (2) of Section 56, the Gram Panchayat may resolves to remove the hindrances, obstruction or encroachment vested in the State Government and may refer to the Tehsildar to remove such hindrances.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that the Gram Panchayat is taking action because petitioners contested election against the sitting Sarpanch and now he is trying to take revenge from the petitioners. As on today, only show cause notice was issued to the petitioners and the petitioners have already submitted reply alongwith documents.

6. Let Gram Panchayat take a decision and if any adverse decision is taken against the petitioners, he may challenge before the prescribed authority of the Gram Panchayat. If any adverse order is passed, same may not be given effect for seven days so that the petitioners may avail the remedy under the law.

With the aforesaid, Writ Petition is disposed of.

(VIVEK RUSIA) JUDGE Praveen Signature Not Verified Signed by: PRAVEEN Signing time: 25-04- 2024 17:36:12

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top