SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 20216

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK RUSIA
Ruchi Soya Industries Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Naval Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Vinay Patwardhan,

ORDER

1. The petitioner/employer has filed the present petition challenging order dated 27.6.2019 passed by the Controlling Authority and order dated 20.10.2023 passed by the appellate authority under the Gratuity Act. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the respondent submitted an application before the Controlling Authority claiming gratuity amount of Rs.1,17,658/-. The said case was registered as Case No. 92/2012. The petitioner appeared and filed the reply by submitting that the respondent worked with it for a period of 10 years and his last wages was Rs.3625/-, therefore, Rs.18,822/- is payable to the respondent as a gratuity amount. The aforesaid amount was deposited by way of cheque. The aforesaid case was dismissed in default. Thereafter, the respondent filed an application under Order 9 Rule 9 of the C.P.C. Which came to be allowed and the case was restored to its original number. After restoration of the case, the petitioner submitted that the respondent was terminated from service and his case is pending before the competent court, therefore, at this stage, amount of gratuity cannot be ascertained.

3. Learned Controlling authority rejected the aforesaid c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top