Back
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
SHRI JUSTICE PREM NARAYAN SINGH, J
Rajeev – Appellant
Versus
Mahendra – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for cancellation of bail (Para 1) |
| 2. submission regarding threats (Para 2) |
| 3. response to cancellation request (Para 3 , 4) |
| 4. power of cancellation of bail (Para 5) |
| 5. use of cancellation power (Para 6) |
| 6. review of bail orders (Para 7) |
| 7. bail conditions and complaints (Para 8) |
| 8. distinction in bail processes (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 9. principles for cancellation (Para 12) |
1. The present application is filed by the applicant under Section 483(3) of BNSS , 2023. for cancellation of bail granted to the respondent no.1 vide order dated 28.05.2024, passed in MCRC No.20250/2024.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the petition of respondent was allowed vide order dated 28.05.2024, but the respondent no.1 is trying to threat the complainant. In this case, a complaint has been filed in the police station Annapurna, Indore addressed to Police Station Tilak Nagar, Indore. It is also submitted that while getting the bail by respondent no.1 from this Court, certain facts have not been placed and the bail has not been acquired by clean hands. Hence, the bail order is liable to be cancelled.
3. On the other hand, learned Senior counsel for respondent no.1
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
