2023 Supreme(Online)(MP) 6077
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT GWALIOR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANAND PATHAK
MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 24900 of 2023
BETWEEN:-
VIJENDRA SINGH SIKARWAR S/O SHRI TEK
SINGH SIKARWAR, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURIST R/O- GOPAL
PURA, P.S. KOTWALI DISTRICT MORENA
(MADHYA PRADESH)
.....APPLICANT
(BY SHRI HARSHIT SHARMA - ADVOCATE)
AND
1. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
THROUGH POLICE STATION KOTWALI
DISTRICT MORENA (MADHYA PRADESH)
2.
RAVI VAISHYA S/O SHRI HEERA SINGH
VAISHYA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,
OCCUPATION: PRIVATE JOB R/O- BEHIND
COMMANDANT BUNGLOW, AMPURA, P.S.
KOTWALI, DIST. MORENA (MADHYA
PRADESH)
3.
DEVENDRA SINGH KIRAR (YADAV) S/O SHRI
RAMKISHAN KIRAR, AGED ABOUT 52
YEARS, OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURIST
R/O- VILLAGE AMPURA, DIST. MORENA
(MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(BY SHRI VIRENDRA PAL – DEPUTY ADVOCATE GENERAL)
Vijay Dutta Sharma,Advocate General
AND
Signed by: RASHID KHAN
Signing time: 21-09-2023
06:02:31 PM
Signature Not Verified
2
MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 24901 of 2023
VIJENDRA SINGH SIKARWAR S/O SHRI TEK
1.
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
LALLU@ GAURAV S/O SHRI DEVENDRA
SINGH KIRAR (YADAV), AGED ABOUT 22
YEARS, OCCUPATION: STUDENT R/O-
VILLAGE AAMPURA P.S. KOTWALI DISTT.
MORENA (MADHYA PRADESH)
Reserved on
:
12/09/2023
Pronounced on
:
21/09/2023
These petitions having been heard and reserved for order coming
on for pronouncement this day, this Court passed the following:
ORDER
With consent heard finally.
1.
Regard being had to the similitude of the subject matter involved, both
the cases are heard analogously and disposed of by a common order. For
Signed by: RASHID KHAN
Signing time: 21-09-2023
06:02:31 PM
Signature Not Verified
3
convenience's sake, facts of Misc. Criminal Case No.24900 of 2023 are taken
into consideration.
Instant petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the
petitioner for issuance of direction to the learned Trial Court for expeditious
conclusion of proceedings/criminal trial in relation to the case pending at SC
DOCT No.10/2019 before learned Special Judge (MPDVPK Act), District
Morena.
Petitioner is the informant/complainant/victim in the instant case,
wherein at his behest, an FIR bearing Crime No.1364/2018 has been lodged
because of the murder of his son Raghvendra, in which on the basis of his
information, case was registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 394 of the
Indian Penal Code and Sections 11, 13 of the M.P. Dakaiti Aur Vyapharan
Prabhavit Kshetra Adhiniyam, 1981 (hereinafter referred as “MPDVPK Act”).
4.
Investigation was carried out by the police, wherein the accused
persons were apprehended and arrested and after conclusion of investigation,
charge-sheet was filed before the Special Court so established under the
MPDVPK Act, whereby after taking of the cognizance for the offences,
charges were framed for offences under Sections 396, 394, 302, 147, 148,
149, 120-B of IPC, Sections 25, 27 of the Arms Act, 1959 and Sections 11, 13
of the MPDVPK Act.
5.
Out of five named accused persons, three accused persons were
juvenile and out of them, one CICL namely Lallu @ Gaurav was ordered to be
tried as an adult by the Juvenile Justice Board, whose order was affirmed by
the Session Court and therefore, he is being tried before the court of V
Additional Session Judge, Morena in Sessions Trial No.149/2019.
6.
As the date of incident was 19.12.2018 and cognizance was taken for
Signed by: RASHID KHAN
Signing time: 21-09-2023
06:02:31 PM
Signature Not Verified
4
the offence in the instant matter on 15.03.2019, wherefor more than four years
have elapsed and all the eye-witnesses have been examined before the learned
Trial Court and only official and formal witnesses are yet to be examined and
through the proceedings filed by the petitioner with the petition as well as
synopsis indicate that because of non-appearance of some witnesses, case is
lingered on, therefore, this petition has been preferred.
7.
It is the submission of learned counsel for petitioner that only the
formal witnesses are left to depose before the learned Trial Court, wherein
police witnesses including Investigating Officer are not turning up for
deposition on summons, therefore, the learned Trial Court was compelled to
issue bailable warrants and in certain situations, even arrest warrants are
issued for securing the presence of police/formal witnesses.
8.
Right to Speedy Trial and Access of Justice is one of the fundamental
rights of the petitioner as enshrined under Article 21 of the Constitution. The
right to speedy trial extends equally to all criminal prosecutions and is not
confined to any particular category of cases. When delay is not caused at the
instance of informant/complainant party, it is all the more important the trial
be conducted in a time bound manner because already more than four and half
years have been spent.
9.
Some of the accused persons meanwhile i