SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(MP) 5850

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Brijesh Kumar Mishra – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Anuj Pathak,Advocate General

This criminal revision under Section 397/401 of the Code of

Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as "Cr.P.C.") has been

2

filed assailing the order dated 03.10.2023 (Annex.A/1) passed by

learned Special Judge, NDPS Act, Sidhi in connection with Crime

No.294/2023 for commission of offence under section 8,21,22 and

29 of NDPS Act whereby application filed by the applicant under

section 167(2) of Cr.P.C for grant of default bail has been rejected

on the ground that though charge sheet has not been filed within a

period of 90 days but time granted for filing the charge sheet had

already been extended to 180 days by the incharge court.

2.

As per prosecution story in the intervening night of 17/18-

06.2023, 10 gram smack was seized from the possession of the

applicant. The seized quantity of contraband was higher than the

minimum quantity but less than the commercial quantity.

3.

Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that applicant

was arrested on 17/18-06.2023 in connection with Crime

No.294/2023 of P.S.Bahari District Sidhi for offence punishable

under section 8, 21,22 and 29 of NDPS Act. He was produced

before the court on 18.06.2023 and since then he is in judicial

custody. I

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top