SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 2201

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Tarun Kumar Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Vijay Kumar Bandil – Respondent


Advocates:
Sanjay Kumar Sharma,

ORDER

M.P. No.5205 of 2022 has been filed by the petitioner assailing the order dated 31.10.2022 passed in Civil Suit No.192A/2017 passed by learned 1st Civil Judge, Class II to Vth Additional Judge, Morena District Morena and M.P. No.3021 of Signature Not Verified Signed by: YOGENDRA

2022 has been filed by the petitioner assailing the order dated 01.07.2022 passed in Civil Suit No.193A/2017 by learned 1st Civil Judge, Class II, Morena District Gwalior whereby the applications preferred by the petitioners under Section 151 CPC have been rejected by the learned trial Court holing that the amendment in Civil Procedure Code is not retrospective but prospective.

2. Short facts of the case are that the respondent/plaintiff filed a suit for eviction against the petitioner seeking eviction on the ground of 12(1)(a), (b) and (f) of M.P. Accommodation Control Act. Written statement was filed by the petitioner/defendant denying the averments as pleaded in the plaint and the learned Trial Court framed the issues. After framing of issues, plaintiff-Vijay Kumar Bandil alongwith two other witnesses i.e. Pradeep Kumar Kamal and Kishore Bandil submitted their statements in chief as per the provision

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top