HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Gulab Amule – Appellant
Versus
Dinesh Bramhe – Respondent
ORDER
This Misc. Appeal is filed by the owner and driver of the offending vehicle being aggrieved of the award dated 31.03.2015 by learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Balaghat in MACC No. 172/2013, wherein on account of non-availability of driving license to drive a two wheeler with which the accident took place an award has been passed to pay the compensation and recover it from the owner and driver of the offending vehicle.
Ms. Priyal Rahangdale submits that the impugned award is faulty. Since, the driver of the offending vehicle was having license to drive a four wheeler, therefore, he was automatically entitled to drive a two wheeler.
Shri Aditya Narayan Sharma dispute this fact and submits that this aspect has been dealt with by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Zaharulnisha & Ors. (2008)12 SCC 385 and by this Court in the case of Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Satya Prakash Bhadoria & Ors. 2018 SCC OnLine MP 1809 and so also in M.A. No. 1500/2017 (Rajjo Bai Vs. Vijay Patel & Ors.) decided on
28.08.2023.
After hearing learned counsel for the parties, it is no more in dispute that Driver of the vehicle should possess
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.