SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(MP) 3813

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Gulab Amule – Appellant
Versus
Dinesh Bramhe – Respondent


Advocates:
Sanjay Sharma,

ORDER

This Misc. Appeal is filed by the owner and driver of the offending vehicle being aggrieved of the award dated 31.03.2015 by learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Balaghat in MACC No. 172/2013, wherein on account of non-availability of driving license to drive a two wheeler with which the accident took place an award has been passed to pay the compensation and recover it from the owner and driver of the offending vehicle.

Ms. Priyal Rahangdale submits that the impugned award is faulty. Since, the driver of the offending vehicle was having license to drive a four wheeler, therefore, he was automatically entitled to drive a two wheeler.

Shri Aditya Narayan Sharma dispute this fact and submits that this aspect has been dealt with by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Zaharulnisha & Ors. (2008)12 SCC 385 and by this Court in the case of Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Satya Prakash Bhadoria & Ors. 2018 SCC OnLine MP 1809 and so also in M.A. No. 1500/2017 (Rajjo Bai Vs. Vijay Patel & Ors.) decided on

28.08.2023.

After hearing learned counsel for the parties, it is no more in dispute that Driver of the vehicle should possess

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top