ORDER

Of a note, the petitioner in all these petitions are one and the same.

By the instant revision petitions filed under Section 397/401 of Cr.P.C., the petitioner is challenging the order of framing of charge by the trial Court.

Indeed, this batch is amalgam of petitions originated from the orders of different dates but having similar nature framing the charge under Sections 420, 409 of IPC against the petitioner by different trial Courts. Ergo, for the purpose of convenience, the facts mentioned in Cr.R.No.3019/2023 are being taken note of.

Succinct portrayal of facts is that the petitioner and her husband, said to be a Director of the Company, entered into agreements with different persons for selling the plots and receive the amount, but plots could not be sold and as such complaints made to the police for registration of offence against the petitioner and her husband. Initially, six cases were registered consolidating complaints made at the relevant point of time by the complainants showing their grievance as they were cheated by the petitioner and her husband. Later-on cases got increased and total 10 cases were registered and after filing of charge- sheet, 10 different Se