SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 10862

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Ramwati – Appellant
Versus
Sundar Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Sanjana Sahni,

ORDER

This miscellaneous appeal has been filed under Order 43 Rule 1 (u) of the CPC being aggrieved with the remand order passed by the Principle District Judge, Dindori in RCA No.367/2019 vide order dated 31.10.2023 by which the judgment and decree passed by the trial Court in First Civil Judge, Class-II, Dindori in Civil Suit No.31-A/2017 was set aside and the case was remanded for fresh trial.

2. In a nutshell the plaintiff Sundar Singh and Gulwati filed a Civil Suit pleading that the Survey No.465 admeasuring area 4.24 hectare and Survey No.317 admeasuring are 0.21 hectare land were the ancestral property. On the basis of that the disputed property belongs to Basor and Basor was having two sons Dhola and Mangal and Dhola in his life time partitioned the ancestral property and in that partition Hanuman, Takkan Bai and Kunwariya Bai has given their respective share and their name was recorded separately in the Revenue papers. It was also pleaded that the deceased Dhola kept Maha Singh in his home as Lumsanai of Kunwariya Bai. Maha Singh and Kunwariya Bai has maintained and taken care of Dhola. Kunwariya Bai expired in the year 1997 and in 2002 the plaintiff Sundar Singh left his V

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top