SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 6577

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
SHRI JUSTICE SANJEEV S KALGAONKAR, J
Smt. Shilpi Kaurav – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
MCRC 16435/2024



Advocates:
Sushil Goswami,Advocate General

The court granted bail despite serious allegations, emphasizing the applicant's lack of prior criminal history and absence of evidence tampering risk.

Headnote:(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 439 - Bail application - The applicant sought bail in connection with serious offences under IPC and POCSO Act, having been in custody since 16/04/2024 - The prosecution alleged that the applicant was involved in the rape of a minor, with the victim's statement evolving over time. (Paras 1-3)

(B) Bail considerations - The court considered the gravity of the alleged offences, the applicant's lack of criminal antecedents, and the absence of evidence tampering risk - The court emphasized the need for a balanced approach in granting bail while ensuring the integrity of the trial process. (Paras 4-5)

Facts of the case:
The applicant was accused of serious offences against a minor, with the victim's complaint evolving significantly after the incident. The applicant had been in custody since April 2024, and the prosecution argued against bail based on the severity of the allegations and potential witness tampering.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the applicant should be granted bail, considering the circumstances and lack of evidence tampering risk.

Issues: The main issues included the evolution of the victim's statement, the applicant's previous conduct, and the potential for witness tampering.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that despite the serious nature of the allegations, the applicant's lack of prior criminal history and the absence of immediate risk of evidence tampering warranted the granting of bail.

Result: Bail application allowed.

ORDER

This first bail application has been filed by applicant under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of bail in connection with Crime No.128/2023 registered at Police Station Daboh District Bhind (M.P.) for offence punishable under Sections 354, 342, 34,109 of the IPC, Section 7/8, 11/12, 16/17 of the POCSO Act and enhanced Section 109 read with Section 376(3) of the IPC and Section 17, 4(2) read with Section 3 of the POCSO Act. The applicant is in judicial custody since 16/04/2024. A s per the case of prosecution, prsoecutrix, aged around 16 years submitted a typed complaint on 10/07/2023 to SHO PS Daboh, District Bhind that on 09/07/2023 around 9.00 am, her neighbour- Shilpi Chachi came to her house and asked her for assistance. She went with Shilpi (applicant) to her home. As she entered into room, Shilpi closed the door. Raghvendra who was sitting in room, caught hold her right hand. She pushed Raghvendra and ran away. Thereafter, she met her brother on way and narrated the incident to him. As her parents had gone out of town, she came to lodge report after return of her parents. PS Daboh District Bhind registered FIR at Crime No. 128/2023 for offence punishable under Sections 354, 342, 34 of the IPC and Section 11/12 and 16/17 of the POCSO Act. Statements of victim was recorded under Sections 161 and 164 of the Cr.P.C. On completion of Final Report was submitted against Raghvendra Kaurav and Shilpi. During trial, evidence of victim was recorded on 21/09/2023 by learned Special Judge (POCSO) Act Lahar, District Bhind. Victim alleged that Raghvendra committed rape on her. Statements of father of the victim (P.W.1) and brother of victim (P.W.3) were also recorded on 20/09/2023 and 05/10/2023 respectively. Prosecution moved an application under Section 216 of the Cr.P.C. Learned Trial Court took cognizance of offence punishable under Section 376(3) of the IPC and Section 3/4 of the POCSO Act against the applicant. Thereafter, prosecution moved another application for cancellation of bail. Application was allowed vide order dated 16/04/2024 and applicant was taken into custody. Thereafter, applicant filed an application under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C which was rejected. Learned Counsel for the applicant, in addition to the grounds mentioned in the application, submits that initially there was no allegation in typed complaint of the victim, FIR or statement of the victim recorded under Section 161 and 164 of the Cr.P.C. Victim has alleged rape for the first time on 21/09/2023 almost two months after the alleged incident. No plausible explanation is available for delay in making the allegation. Learned counsel further contends that applicant has not misused the liberty extended to her earlier. No criminal antecedent is alleged against the applicant. Jail incarceration on false allegations is causing hardship to the applicant. Applicant is aged 32 years. Applicant is homemaker by profession. There is no likelihood of her absconsion leaving her family and home. No further custodial interrogation is needed against the applicant. There is no likelihood of tampering with evidence by the applicant. Trial would take time to conclude. Therefore, applicant may be extended the benefit of bail.

P er contra, learned Counsel for the State ably assisted by learned counsel for the complainant opposes the bail application on the ground of gravity of alleged offence. Learned counsel for the objector referring to FIR in Crime No. 106/2024 of PS Daboh District Bhind submits that relatives of the applicant namely Janved, Akash Kaurav and Balveer Kaurav had poured alcohol on Mangal Singh, father of the victim on 12/05/2024 and threatened him for compromise. Thus, the applicant is threatening the witnesses through his relatives. Therefore, applicant may not be extended benefit of bail. In reply, Learned counsel for the applicant submits that in other matter there is no allegation, that incident happened due to framing of c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top