HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
SHRI JUSTICE BINOD KUMAR DWIVEDI, J
Karan Singh – Appellant
Versus
Prerit Tiwari – Respondent
CRR 1696/2024
Heard on admission as well as on I.A.No.5793/2024 filed for exempting the requirement of surrender of respondent.
2. This criminal revision under Section 397 read with Section 401 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred as, ' Cr.P.C .') has been filed by the applicant against the order dated 08/02/2024 passed in Cr.A.No.186/2023 by III Additional Sessions Judge, Indore (M.P.) dismissing the appeal preferred against the order dated 29/04/2023 passed in Criminal Case No.3122843/2016 by Judicial Magistrate First Class, Indore, wherein the applicant was convicted for the offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and sentenced to under go Rigorous Imprisonment of 01 years with compensation of Rs.68,52,302/-.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant himself presented bank statement to reflect that the applicant has deposited Rs.20,00,000/- in the bank account of respondent No.2, which the Trial Court as well as Appellate Court have failed to appreciate and interpret the evidence in accordance with law. Both the Courts below have failed to consider the existence of legally recoverable debt or liability of Rs.34,26,151/- in absence of positive evidence. He further submits that applicant is suffering from heart ailment and therefore, he is unable to surrender before the learned trial Court. Surrendering of the applicant before trial Court for entertaining the criminal revision is not mandatory. On these grounds, learned counsel prays for exemption from surrender and to admit the criminal revision.
4. To bolster his submissions, learned counsel for the applicant placing reliance on para No.4 the order dated 20/02/2024 passed in Criminal Revision No.729/2024 ( Sanjay Nagayach Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh ) by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court at Jabalpur and the same is extracted herein below:
5. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondent / State has opposed the prayer by referring Rule 48 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh Rules, 2008. She has also placed reliance on the order passed by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court at Indore in the matter of Devnarayan and Others Vs. Prateek Goyanka (passed in Criminal Revision No.1912/2024 on 28/05/2024). On these contentions, she prays for dismissal of application along with the criminal revision as it is not maintainable without surrender of the applicant.
6. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
7. For ready reference, Rule 48 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh Rules, 2008 reads as under:-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.