1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT GWALIOR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE GURPAL SINGH AHLUWALIA
ON THE 27th OF OCTOBER, 2022
CONC No. 415 OF 2022
Between:-
SUO MOTO IN THE MATTER OF THE
STATE OF M.P.
….....APPELLANT
(BY SHRI A.K. NIRANKARI - GOVT.
ADVOCATE)
AND
1.
FATHER OF PROSECUTRIX
“A”, SON OF GARIBDAS, RESIDENT
OF VILLAGE BIDNIYA, P.S. CIVIL
LINES, DATIA.
2.
PROSECUTRIX “X”, D/O “A”,
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BIDNIYA,
P.S. CIVIL LINES, DATIA.
3.
AJMER YADAV SON OF
DWARIKA
PRASAD
YADV,
RESIDENT
OF
VILLAAGE
BIDANIYA, P.S. CIVIL LINES, DISTT.
DATIA.
4.
SANTOSH PARIHAR, SON OF
RAGUNATH,
RESIDENT
OF
VILLAGE REDA, P.S. DEHAT,
TAHSIL AND DISTT. DATIA.
5.
SONU PARIHAR @ NATHU
PARIHAR, SON OF MAHENDRA
SINGH PARIHAR, RESIDENT OF
2
VILLAGE BICHHONDANA, TEHSIL
BHANDER, P.S. CIVIL LINES,
DATIA.
6.
AJAY KANT SHRIVASTAVA,
SON OF LATE N.R. SHRIVASTAVA,
RESIDENT OF TIGALIA DAROGA
WALI GALI, DISTT. DATIA
7.
P.K. GARG, D.P.O., AT
PRESENT D.P.O., S.P.E. LOKAYUKT,
BHOPAL.
8.
DEVENDRA
SHRIVASTAVA,
SON
OF
LAXMINARAYAN
SHRIVASTAVA,
RESIDENT
OF
MUDIAN KA KUA, WARD NO. 28,
DATIA.
9.
ADITYA KHARE, SON OF R.S.
KHARE, RESIDENT OF THANDI
SADAK, DATIA.
10.
ANIL AWASTHY, SON OF R.B.
AWASTHI, R/O BADE BAZAR,
DATIA.
11.
MEHMOOD KHAN, SON OF
LATE SHRI MUNABBAR KHAN,
RESIDENT
OF
GHOSIPURA,
GWALIOR.
......RESPONDENTS
(SMT. KALPANA PARMAR, ADVOCATE
FOR RESPONDENTS NO. 1 AND 2)
(NONE FOR RESPONDENT NO.3)
(SHRI SUNIL DUBEY, ADVOCATE FOR
RESPONDENT NO.4)
(NONE FOR RESPONDENT NO. 5)
(SHRI RAJIV SHARMA, ADVOCATE FOR
RESPONDENT NO. 6 AND 11)
(SHRI RAJIV BUDHOLIYA, ADVOCATE
FOR RESPONDENT NO. 7)
(NONE FOR RESPONDENT NO.8)
3
(SHRI JITENDRA SHARMA, ADVOCATE
FOR RESPONDENT NO. 9)
(SHRI
SAURABH
BHELSELWALE,
ADVOCATE, FOR RESPONDENT NO. 10).
__________________________________________________________
Heard on
: 17th-October-2022
Delivered on
:
__________________________________________________________
This Contempt Petition coming on for hearing this day, Hon'ble Shri
Justice G.S. Ahluwalia, passed the following:
1.
This Contempt Petition has been registered on suo moto exercise
of power by this Court by order dated 10-2-2022 passed in M.Cr.C. No.
7380 of 2022 (Sonu Parihar @ Nathu Vs. State of M.P.).
2.
This case shows a very sorry state of affairs, where some people in
order to get rid of unwarranted pregnancy due to voluntary relationship
with a close relative, have misused the lawful authority of this Court, by
adopting a very innovative method. It is a very high time to put a check
on this type of tendency, because the purpose of Medical termination of
Pregnancy Act, 1971 is to provide for the termination of certain
pregnancies by registered medical practitioners and for matters connected
therewith or incidental thereto. Only specific pregnancies are to be
permitted to be ended by licensed medical professionals. The primary
objectives of the Act are also to reduce the death rate of women from
unsafe and illegal abortions and to optimize the maternal health of Indian
women. Only after this legislation, women are entitled to have safe
abortions, but only under specific circumstances. However, the lawful
authority of High Court cannot be permitted to be misused to terminate
4
the unwarranted pregnancy by hiding the identity of the biological father
of the child. Section 3 of Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971
deals with a situation under which the pregnancy can be terminated by a
Medical Practitioner, which reads as under :
3. When pregnancies may be terminated by registered
medical practitioners.—(1) Notwithstanding anything
contained in the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), a registered
medical practitioner shall not be guilty of any offence under
that Code or under any other law for the time being in force, if
any pregnancy is terminated by him in accordance with the
provisions of this Act.
(2) Subject to the provisions of sub-section (4), a pregnancy
may be terminated by a registered medical practitioner,—
(a) where the length of the pregnancy does not exceed twenty
weeks, if such medical practitioner is, or
(b) where the length of the pregnancy exceeds twenty weeks
but does not exceed twenty-four weeks in case of such category
of woman as may be prescribed by rules made under this Act, if
not less than two registered medical practitioners are,
of the opinion, formed in good faith, that—
(i) the continuance of the pregnancy would involve a risk to the
life of the pregnant woman or of grave injury to her physical or
mental health; or
(ii) there is a substantial risk that if the child were born, it
would suffer from any serious physical or mental abnormality.
Explanation 1.—For the purposes of clause (a), where any
pregnancy occurs as a result of failure of any device or method
used by any woman or her partner for the purpose of limiting
the number of children or preventing pregnancy, the anguish
caused by such pregnancy may be presumed to constitute a
grave injury to the mental health of the pregnant woman.
Explanation 2.—For the purposes of clauses (a) and (b), where
any pregnancy is alleged by the pregnant woman to have been
caused by rape, the anguish caused by the pregnancy shall be
presumed to constitute a grave injury to the mental health of
the pregnant woman.
5
(2-A) The norms for the registered medical practitioner whose
opinion is required for termination of pregnancy at different
gestational age shall be such as may be prescribed by rules
made under this Act.
(2-B) The provisions of sub-section (2) relating to the length of
the pregnancy shall not apply to the termination of pregnancy
by the medical practitioner where such termination is
necessitated by the diagnosis of any of the substantial foetal
abnormalities diagnosed by a Medical Board.
(2-C) Every State Government or Union territory, as the case
may be, shall, by notification in the Official Gazette, constitute
a Board to be called a Medical Board for the purposes of this
Act to exercise such powers and functions as may be
prescribed by rules made under this Act.
(2-D) The Medical Bo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.